Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: vbmoneyspender

No, it was a poorly marketed film and a poorly chosen title.

I’m told that the movie is kinda good, if you can suspend a little belief.


4 posted on 03/25/2012 2:02:07 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kidd

It is vintage-era science fiction and frankly, a little outdated in the storyline, if they stayed true to the book.

I mean civil war soldier era (mixing wild west and mars wild creatures - especially given what real science we know about mars) - just can’t get over willful suspension of disbelief of most people now.


7 posted on 03/25/2012 2:05:36 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: kidd

“No, it was a poorly marketed film and a poorly chosen title.....”
*******************************************************
I agree. My first image when hearing the title was one of Jimmy Carter in an Action movie (not an attractive or exciting image).


9 posted on 03/25/2012 2:11:24 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: kidd

I saw John Carter and Hunger Games recently, and though I liked both, John Carter was a lot better.

Just the worst title in the history of movies is all, and poor marketing overall.


11 posted on 03/25/2012 2:13:51 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: kidd

It is really good and the humans are portrayed heroically too. Unlike Avatar


16 posted on 03/25/2012 2:27:55 PM PDT by vpintheak (Occupy your Brain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson