To: kidd
I saw John Carter and Hunger Games recently, and though I liked both, John Carter was a lot better.
Just the worst title in the history of movies is all, and poor marketing overall.
To: TexasFreeper2009
It appears the early accounts of the film's demise were premature. By the time it clears the CD/VOD market, it will make money despite its $350m budget.
Haven't seen it---would like to---but I almost never go to a theater because of the rude people and the endless stream of trailers. I saw "Act of Valor" and there were at least six movie trailers and at least an equal number of TELEVISION trailers (!!)
12 posted on
03/25/2012 2:18:26 PM PDT by
LS
("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
To: TexasFreeper2009
Sssssss comes to mind as the worst movie title in memory.
I'll ditto the market aspect, though.
To: TexasFreeper2009
Just the worst title in the history of movies is all, and poor marketing overall.
If by poor marketing, you mean basing it on a book series that very few people under the age of 30 have read or even heard of, then I agree completely.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson