To: fremont_steve
Idiots, this book is not pornographic.
3 posted on
03/20/2012 12:42:16 PM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
Exposing children to freedom could be consider pornographic by the Left!
32 posted on
03/20/2012 1:13:25 PM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: driftdiver
Well Card did name one of his kids Michael Geoffrey for the pornagraphic writer Geoffrey Chaucer,
He named them all for writers he “admired”...
Personally I could hardly get through Chaucer when I was in college...
36 posted on
03/20/2012 1:23:30 PM PDT by
Tennessee Nana
(Why should I vote for Bishop Romney when he hates me because I am a Christian)
To: driftdiver
i concur this book is not pornographic except to the left. they probably thing STARSHIPP TROOPERS is pornographics. what do they think 14 year olds see on the interent? and why is the teacher reading it it to the class.
using this same logic i think anything by that commie bastard howard zinn is pornographic.
42 posted on
03/20/2012 1:51:34 PM PDT by
bravo whiskey
(If the little things really bother you, maybe it's because the big things are going well.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson