Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Godebert; butterdezillion

Here is a phone interview where Sheriff Joe discusses his phone conversation with Breitbart....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=aGhpLsl0giM


68 posted on 03/18/2012 8:46:55 PM PDT by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: visually_augmented
From what I read about Shapiro in this article, Breitbart was the heart and the brains and the risk-taker in his organization. Would it be lost on anyone paying attention to the news conference that the sheriff's investigators also reported threats to media personalities?

Breitbart may well have been warming to the false documents evidence. The call was shunted via Jerome Corsi. Arpaio wasn't even aware exactly to whom he was speaking until Breitbart's death was reported and he saw pictures.

Sheriff Arpaio said 'he told me about tapes' he had. The idea that these two important players, who were strangers actually, would start to collaborate could pose a a major problem. If Breitbart cannot follow up and perhaps form a coalition of sorts, cui bono?

69 posted on 03/18/2012 9:40:39 PM PDT by 22cal (Forgiven, not perfected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: visually_augmented

Thanks. In several places Joe implies that Breitbart called him because he knew Joe was having a press conference the next day, and the call was about that. Then later Joe says:

“He mentions that he’s happy that I’m doing my press conference and that I had some good information. And then I hear he dies...”

What Breitbart said to Sheriff Joe doesn’t sound like somebody who thinks the issue is a waste of time and that there’s not enough evidence. It seems a lot different than what Breitbart was saying in Feb of 2010. Having credible sources with access to witnesses and documents makes a big difference. And as I noted in earlier posts, we’ve learned a LOT since February of 2010 - stuff that it seems was not wasted on Andrew Breitbart.

Arpaio mentioned having spoken with Breitbart 4-5 hours before he died. So that must have been early evening (7-8pm) when he spoke to him. A couple hours later Breitbart must have gone to the bar. If I remember correctly he talked for a couple hours with some more liberal guy at the bar, then he heads out to go home about midnight, crosses the street, and almost immediately hits the concrete, dead.

If I’m misunderstanding the timing of things I hope somebody will correct me, but that unfolding of events just looks really fishy.


70 posted on 03/18/2012 10:09:26 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson