Here is a phone interview where Sheriff Joe discusses his phone conversation with Breitbart....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=aGhpLsl0giM
Breitbart may well have been warming to the false documents evidence. The call was shunted via Jerome Corsi. Arpaio wasn't even aware exactly to whom he was speaking until Breitbart's death was reported and he saw pictures.
Sheriff Arpaio said 'he told me about tapes' he had. The idea that these two important players, who were strangers actually, would start to collaborate could pose a a major problem. If Breitbart cannot follow up and perhaps form a coalition of sorts, cui bono?
Thanks. In several places Joe implies that Breitbart called him because he knew Joe was having a press conference the next day, and the call was about that. Then later Joe says:
“He mentions that he’s happy that I’m doing my press conference and that I had some good information. And then I hear he dies...”
What Breitbart said to Sheriff Joe doesn’t sound like somebody who thinks the issue is a waste of time and that there’s not enough evidence. It seems a lot different than what Breitbart was saying in Feb of 2010. Having credible sources with access to witnesses and documents makes a big difference. And as I noted in earlier posts, we’ve learned a LOT since February of 2010 - stuff that it seems was not wasted on Andrew Breitbart.
Arpaio mentioned having spoken with Breitbart 4-5 hours before he died. So that must have been early evening (7-8pm) when he spoke to him. A couple hours later Breitbart must have gone to the bar. If I remember correctly he talked for a couple hours with some more liberal guy at the bar, then he heads out to go home about midnight, crosses the street, and almost immediately hits the concrete, dead.
If I’m misunderstanding the timing of things I hope somebody will correct me, but that unfolding of events just looks really fishy.