Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breitbart Editor Ben Shapiro: We're Going to Vet Obama Except His Forged Selective Service Card
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaE2pUcpwnQ ^

Posted on 03/17/2012 8:02:07 PM PDT by OUTKAST

Breitbart Editor-in-Chief Ben Shapiro: We're Going to Vet Obama Except His Forged Selective Service Registration and Forged Birth Certificate - http://www.BirtherReport.com


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Education
KEYWORDS: benshapiro; benshapiroisaphony; breitbart; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: Seizethecarp

when one is up to their neck in alligators it is sometime late to remember whose bright idea it as to drain the swamp—or so the folk wisdom goes.Evangelical wisdom is that when one decides to take on the Devil they better be sure they know they have someone stronger that Lucifer at heir back.And Never forget it.Because Lucifer will eat the well intentions for a snack. Perhaps our friend took a look at the theories surrounding an unexpected death— and watched with interest the scorched earth defense put before the Sheriff. And reconsidered his strategy?


41 posted on 03/18/2012 3:30:33 AM PDT by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf
In a recent Sheriff Joe radio interview, he said when the forged secret service records were discussed at the press conference. The mocking questions stopped from reporters and it became dead silent.
42 posted on 03/18/2012 3:49:26 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

I’m sure you meant to say forged SELECTIVE service records.

After hearing Ben Shapiro, I’m not hopeful Breitbart.com will be of any help.

It’s going to take another bombshell from Arpaio.


43 posted on 03/18/2012 6:11:20 AM PDT by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: OUTKAST; All

Just by saying it...he is getting it out there..and by saying he isn’t going to vet “THE FORGES CARD” is the best way to do it....leaves no room for the media to go off on him. it’s a slam dunk!


44 posted on 03/18/2012 6:33:22 AM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OUTKAST
Wouldn't it be just typical if Obammy was a product of The Finders CIA operation. It would explain why he has no past and would explain why, despite his marxist philosophy, he is so quick to sign onto every bit of legislation or EO that advances a fascist agenda.

Obammay might not even know his true past having been programmed to have a split personality that can be activated by a specific key phrase. I know people like to compare him to Hitler, but jughead just isn't that bright. He's more of a muppet. The manchkenyan candidate.

45 posted on 03/18/2012 6:50:42 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (Sofa King Mitt Odd Did Obamneycare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP
Yep,big mistake --typo. Thanks.

--forged selective service records--

46 posted on 03/18/2012 7:32:34 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

I haven’t been able to keep up with all the interviews and such. Has somebody asked Arpaio what transpired with Breitbart? If he’s not discussing it, it could be in order to protect Breitbart’s family maybe. It’s hard for me to know what Arpaio needs to keep quiet about for investigative or protective purposes and what he needs to be broadcast. I’m sure there’s a good reason though.


47 posted on 03/18/2012 9:49:39 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Joe always has a reason for what he does. Don’t worry.....he is one man who is fearless.


48 posted on 03/18/2012 10:13:10 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

BINGO. You are absolutely right Butter.

The problem is making it possible for the media to speak about how they were threatened on their own. There is strength in numbers, and apparently a lot of them were threatened. If they would simply tell the truth, they would all be safer. And more honest.


49 posted on 03/18/2012 10:36:58 AM PDT by Danae (Anail nathrach, ortha bhais is beatha, do cheal deanaimh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Danae

do you have a link to the threats


50 posted on 03/18/2012 10:41:49 AM PDT by advertising guy (Sarah just jumped..........game on boys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

I have a link to the TPT bit.


51 posted on 03/18/2012 10:44:25 AM PDT by Danae (Anail nathrach, ortha bhais is beatha, do cheal deanaimh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: advertising guy

Or was that WND, sorry. I think it cross linked there anyway.


52 posted on 03/18/2012 10:45:21 AM PDT by Danae (Anail nathrach, ortha bhais is beatha, do cheal deanaimh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Beatthedrum
" Breitbart would have blown the lid off the whole forgery story if he had lived to meet with Arpiao and see the evidence of forgery. Instead he’s dead and his organization now is backing away from it."

Backing away from it? Breitbart and his little neocon clique of cowards have tried to marginalize the eligibility issue from the very beginning. This little worm, Ben Shapiro, confirms it.

53 posted on 03/18/2012 11:23:52 AM PDT by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OUTKAST

BookMark


54 posted on 03/18/2012 11:26:23 AM PDT by thesearethetimes... ("Courage, is fear that has said its prayers." Dorothy Bernard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
"The potential Breitbart revelations that died with Breitbart were about Obama’s eligibility and draft registration..."

Do you have even one shred of evidence that Breitbart was pursuing the eligibility issue?

“It’s self-indulgent, it’s narcissistic, it’s a losing issue,” Breitbart told Schilling. “It’s a losing situation. If you don’t have the frigging evidence — raising the question? You can do that to Republicans all day long. You have to disprove that you’re a racist! Forcing them to disprove something is a nightmare.”

“Wouldn’t you say,” asked Schilling, “in this case, that Farah is asking Obama to prove something rather than his disprove it?” Breitbart rejected the premise. “When has a president ever been asked to prove his citizenship?”

Breitbart On "Birthers"

55 posted on 03/18/2012 12:51:04 PM PDT by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

He specifically asked Jerry Corsi to put him in contact with Joe Arpaio, with whom he conversed for about 12 minutes, about 7 hours before he died.

Why would he do that if he still considered this a “losing issue”?

And what would be a greater media nightmare for Obama than Breitbart visibly and completely changing his mind on this issue, thus thrusting the Arpaio presser into the limelight all over the media?


56 posted on 03/18/2012 1:02:30 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
Breitbart is no martyr, and no friend of the Constitution from what he has said in the past regarding presidential eligibility. For all you know, Breitbart was planning a hit-piece on the "birther" Sherif Joe.
57 posted on 03/18/2012 1:14:56 PM PDT by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

Breitbart seemed to diss the eligibility issue at that time (early Feb 2010 - right around the time the left said they were going to use the eligibility issue to paint 2010 candidates as kooks) for tactical reasons (because it was divisive between people who should be allies and it was used by the media to call people racists) and because to that point there was no way to definitively prove anything.

Just to put this in perspective, this was a few weeks after I started my blog. The wrongdoing by the HDOH, as well as the shenanigans to get rid of Hawaii’s open records law, were all as of yet unknown. The problems with the social security number were not known. Pamela Geller had gone quiet on the draft registration. Doug Hagmann had not yet published his story about the media being threatened. None of the discrepancies in the newspaper announcement claims or images were yet known. I think that might have been even before Lakin refused to go to Afghanistan and we found that Obama would let a decorated military surgeon go to jail rather than show a simple birth certificate. We had not had 2 Georgia judges totally defy standard judicial protocols and evidentiary standards.

A lot has happened since Breitbart said those things. Breitbart was not stupid. And his willingness to vet Obama this time around showed he was also not a coward. He knew that a law enforcement body has credibility far beyond that of anonymous internet posters and folks like Orly Taitz.

Back in early Feb of 2010 there was not enough evidence for Breitbart to pursue the eligibility issue. With a credible law enforcement body poised to make an announcement regarding the evidence they had found, Breitbart wanted to know what the evidence was. And we know that the evidence that Arpaio would have given him was that there was probable cause for forgery and fraud.

If evidence is what Breitbart was waiting for, then that wait ended when he spoke to Joe Arpaio that night. A fact that would have been known by anybody monitoring his communications. And Breitbart was dead about 7 hours later.


58 posted on 03/18/2012 1:26:31 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Godebert

If Breitbart believed the issue was a waste of time why would he do a hit piece on Arpaio? It makes absolutely no sense.

I disagree; I believe Breitbart WAS a martyr for this country.


59 posted on 03/18/2012 1:28:19 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Anything is possible, but it is all pure speculation. Has Sherif Joe said anything regarding his conversation with Breitbart?


60 posted on 03/18/2012 1:38:42 PM PDT by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson