It’s no wonder Romney is so far ahead. I always thought Boortz was a Conservative. My, how that title is thrown around these days.
He states: “ The candidate I would most like to see become president. That would be Newt Gingrich. He’s brilliant. He’s solutions-oriented. And more than any other candidate Newt understands where the greatness of America comes from -— and that ain’t government. Newt won Georgia. That’s it. He didn’t finish any better than third in any other Super Tuesday state. Sarah Palin did vote for him in Alaska, but Newt finished 4th in Palin’s home state. Right now his campaign is struggling.”
Yes, because of cowardly men like Boortz and to some degres Mark Levin as well.
Neal’s not a conservative. He’s a libertarian—mostly.
Although this hardly helps in explaining his support for Romney.
Boortz is pro-abortion and regularly ridicules Christians on his show.
Mitt has drowned Newt in sh*tstorms of lying ads. But he won’t hardly look at Obama himself crosswise. Mitt is a recipe for a second term of Obama.
I am very disappointed!!! I would NEVER have dreamed that Neal
would vote for Romney!!! I WILL NEVER vote for Romney looks like WE
have more principals than they do and that is all that matters!!! Romney
will NEVER win because WE all despise him!!! GOP-E is in for a rude
awakening they truly believe we will all fall in line!!! NOT !!!
The problem, IMO, is that to "conserve" means, in essence, to hold things the same; considering that, someone who wants to keep government bloated and seriously unaccountable (that is, keeping things the same), wants to conserve and therefore is a conservative. If you allow that reasoning, then voting for Romney is the conservative thing to do because [IMO] there is no discernable difference between him and Obama.
accept, just for a moment, that they are right and you are wrong.....just maybe