Bump to read later ...
Turns out that pilots of these modern airliners are very good managers, and not very good pilots. As the process becomes more and more about managing the machines as they do the flying, the “stick and rudder” instincts of the pilots becomes less and less important... until it becomes suddenly very, very important.
Thanks. BTTT.
Wow, this is something I’ve wanted to hear about. When they say “earlier THIS YEAR”, do they mean this young calendar year? Incredible.
So sad. Waiting for the “Seconds from Disaster” episode.
Wow. I read the full Popular Mechanics article. Anyone who’s played Microsoft Flight simulator knows about stall.
I wonder if it is brain freeze or simply over reliance on technology. Per article: “The flight control computer under normal law will not allow an aircraft to stall, aviation experts say”
Even worse, it averages the two inputs, which is a terrible design. One pilot was pushing forward, while the other full back, so the airplane's computer did neither up nor down. Who designs an airplane to operate by democracy? A chain of mistakes combined to cause this accident but bad socialist engineering played a large part.
That wonderful GEE-WIZZ glass instrument panel is what killed those folks. That and not training and making the young pilots to fly the airplane without all the electronics.
To be certified, the aircraft must be able to fly and land safely after a total electrical failure. It can be done, but not if you neglect this configuration in training the pilots.
Air France accident ping!
In IMC, if the air-speed sensors voter was erroneously indicating a high A/S, then the pilot would (properly) be trying to reduce speed to avoid exceeding the NTE speed, which is much more dangerous than a high-altitude stall. Once you exceed NTE the plane will start to lose a wing or elevators and it is doomed. A high-altitude stall can be recovered from, but there is no recovery from a lost wing or tail.
The triply-redundant fly-by-wire flight control system on the Airbus is unable to handle two erroneous data streams (e.g., two bad sensors) and instruments are then lying to him.
Apparently the technology already exists to do this, the main obstacle is that most people in their right mind would never board a passenger plane without having live pilots in the cockpit. However, as we become more reliant on technology, the resistance to this will gradually get lowered.
There is already much research being done on having motor vehicles drive themselves and then we will have the same situation on the ground. During rare instances of equipment malfunction, the "driver" will find him/herself suddenly in control of the vehicle and panic/confusion will ensue.