The first Reuters report out had his father-in-law saying he knew of no cardiac problems and had the coroner’s office saying he hadn’t seen a doctor in over a year.
It’s the discrepancies that make a person wonder what’s really going on here. Sort of reminds me of the Bin Laden assassination, where they didn’t have their stories coordinated, posed for a fake photo, wouldn’t show photos of the dead Bin Laden, had a positive DNA match before such a test could even be completed, etc. And then they wondered why people didn’t automatically beleive the story. In the end it was probably the credibility of the SEALS that convinced anybody who was convinced, since neither the media nor the government are credible.
With Breitbart we’ll never know for sure because there’s nothing our government can’t simply lie about, and we don’t have anybody honorable like the SEALS involved that we could trust. Which is a very serious problem.
Agree absolutely.