Hell, I’ll play along with some ‘what-ifs.’
If I were the team targeting some “person of interest,’ first I would look for their weaknesses, drug use, medical issues, psychological issues. Then study their habits - like when they are alone, where they go, anything that could be exploited.
Once the weakness is found then the most obvious thing is to exploit it - as that is the best way to make it seem like there was no foul play involved.
Just saying - people who do wetwork for a living are not stupid, they are playing chess, while most of the sheeple out there can only see the world as a game of checkers.
No wonder they’re winning.
Finally, as a change of pace - if a guy’s profile said he was known to be depressed you would try and find him when he was alone, hit him with over-amped stun gun, and then get him in a noose. Since people would say he was depressed, no one would question the suicide. That one is fairly easy.
Again, I spent only a few minutes thinking about it (it ain’t my job). The real bad guys are way more sophisticated. Being completely naive is no way to get our freedoms back.
I've been thinking about the possibility you have put forth.
The stun gun might be a problem though. I think that would show up on a ‘legit’ autopsy.
The moment I heard “natural causes”, I got suspicious.
My Mother says you can have fleas and ticks.
It could have been natural; it could have been natural with something else natural going on; it could have been something beside the heart and still be natural; it could be foul play.
It could have been many things; but can a legal autopsy be performed within 6 hours of death and, for sure, be called this, that, or the other happened. Toxicology can take weeks/months to determine cause of death.
What a loss for his family, friends, the conservative movement, patriots and our country.
RIP
I meant to ping you to this one too: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2856341/posts
I think your theory is dead-on. With Obamacare there would be a national database of medical records. That would make it REALLY easy for the government to assassinate people they considered “dangerous to national security”.
I was at the doctor’s office just this afternoon. The receptionist said they had a new privacy policy; would I like a copy? So I said yeah and took and read it. I don’t know if this is new or not, but it struck me as odd:
“Specialized Government Functions. We may use and disclose your medical information for national security and intelligence activities authorized by law or for protective services of the President.”
What does my medical record have to do with “protective services of the President”? There is a different category for “Threats to Health or Safety” - where they say they will disclose or use medical information to “avert a serious threat to health and safety” - including for law enforcement purposes. So the reference to protecting the President is not about the clinic informing somebody that a crazy person is making threats against Obama.
Bizarre.