Was Breitbart LEGALLY Assassinated?

vanity | 3/4/12 | null and void

[No One Special]

The video’s up now on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1wiGDYPALI
One hour and 21 minutes.
If you want to watch it without going to youtube this will put just the video in your browser:
http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=F1wiGDYPALI;autoplay=0

[Unknowing]

Fascinating line of thought, butterdezillion.

[beaversmom]

Nice message LJ.

[butterdezillion]

I knew I would forget a lot of people I should have pinged. Ping to http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2856341/posts

[Flotsam_Jetsome]

Thanks so much!

[little jeremiah]

Thank you. I should pray for his soul, haven’t yet.

We are in dire times.

[butterdezillion]

I meant to ping you to this one too: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2856341/posts

I think your theory is dead-on. With Obamacare there would be a national database of medical records. That would make it REALLY easy for the government to assassinate people they considered “dangerous to national security”.

I was at the doctor’s office just this afternoon. The receptionist said they had a new privacy policy; would I like a copy? So I said yeah and took and read it. I don’t know if this is new or not, but it struck me as odd:

“Specialized Government Functions. We may use and disclose your medical information for national security and intelligence activities authorized by law or for protective services of the President.”

What does my medical record have to do with “protective services of the President”? There is a different category for “Threats to Health or Safety” - where they say they will disclose or use medical information to “avert a serious threat to health and safety” - including for law enforcement purposes. So the reference to protecting the President is not about the clinic informing somebody that a crazy person is making threats against Obama.

Bizarre.