1 posted on
02/03/2012 4:45:46 PM PST by
satan69
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: satan69
I’m not surprised.
zero’s thugs and threats got to him!
2 posted on
02/03/2012 4:49:15 PM PST by
DustyMoment
(Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
To: satan69
But Sheriff Arpaio’s posse is going to have qualified expert witnesses.
4 posted on
02/03/2012 4:52:58 PM PST by
goldi
To: satan69
Mark Hatfield, one of the attorneys who, along with Van Irion, focused on the issue of the definition of natural born citizen, said the judge ignored the issue of burden of proof.
If Obama has the burden of proof, and failed to show up, clearly he didnt carry the burden, he told WND. The judge here completely ignores that.
He also noted it was highly unusual for a judge to reach into another states repository of court rulings to fetch something that would be supportive of the result when the U.S. Supreme Court itself has made a determination.
He said hes hoping the Georgia secretary of state will evaluate the issue carefully, but hes prepared to take the dispute to the appeals level.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/judge-says-obama-can-be-on-georgia-ballot/
To: satan69
Wow, didn’t see that coming. /SUPER-BIG SARC
6 posted on
02/03/2012 5:02:03 PM PST by
LaybackLenny
(All hail Her Royal Highness Sarah, Queen of The Hobbits)
To: satan69
7 posted on
02/03/2012 5:03:24 PM PST by
patriot08
(TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
To: satan69
And that would now make two courts that have ruled that Obama was born in the US and is a natural born citizen.
To: satan69
“When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked bears rule, the people mourn.” Proverbs 29:2
Sadly, we live in an ungodly lawless age. May Almighty God have mercy on His righteous living in this wicked land.
10 posted on
02/03/2012 5:14:32 PM PST by
datakcy
(Declaring our love for God, country, and family ISN'T hate speech - it's common sense!)
To: satan69
should have taken the default judgement
11 posted on
02/03/2012 5:15:30 PM PST by
Mr. K
(Physically unable to profreed <--- oops, see?)
I am absolutely flabbergasted at this result.
It has been said, over and over, that 0bama thinks himself to be above the law, not to be bothered with mere legal questions and challenges. With this decision, it certainly appears he may be correct.
This judge should be removed from the bench.
14 posted on
02/03/2012 5:22:02 PM PST by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
To: satan69
another judge ‘on the take’.......how much more could he have possibly wanted??? DAMN!!!
16 posted on
02/03/2012 5:29:31 PM PST by
tuffy1
(tuffy1)
To: satan69
Stop gasping for breath, people. Think it through - no matter who won at this level, it would be appealed.
Knowing that, the judge simply did not want to be the one who went against a sitting president, since he wouldn’t be the final rule anyway. So, he played it safe.
The significant thing that happened here was that by allowing the case to be heard, he gave it standing and let it into the system.
This will be decided by the USSC, or not at all.
18 posted on
02/03/2012 5:35:17 PM PST by
Talisker
(Apology accepted, Captain Needa.)
To: satan69
Obama “became a citizen at birth and is a natural-born citizen,” Malihi wrote. Accordingly, Obama is eligible as a candidate for the upcoming presidential primary in March, the judge said
To: satan69
How much did obamas handlers pay the judge, or did they just threaten him? Inquiring minds want to know.
24 posted on
02/03/2012 5:51:10 PM PST by
mardi59
To: satan69
The Judge knows that he is not a natural born citizen.
BUT, the judge was told that “Federal” election law states that he must accept another states documents as statement of fact.
And they probably told him that would kill him if he found otherwise. (Remember, they burned Palin’s Church)
28 posted on
02/03/2012 6:03:03 PM PST by
Texas Fossil
(Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
To: satan69
I am sorry I read this thread. I am sick to my stomach.
31 posted on
02/03/2012 6:14:18 PM PST by
JohnG45
To: satan69
Why isn’t this in breaking news?
Shouldn’t ALL Freepers know about this?
To: satan69
The Judge is a lying a$$ hole. He told all four Plaintiff’s lawyers he would issue an adverse ruling against the defendant in an in chambers pre-hearing confernce. Promulgation of this ruling is a lie and makes the entire proceeding a farces.
40 posted on
02/03/2012 7:02:16 PM PST by
STJPII
To: satan69
I am a realist. Obviously, our entire political system, the courts, the conservative and Marxist media, law enforcement, and our highest military are utterly corrupt. An oath means nothing to them. Millions of our citizens are willing to vote for a Marxist with a completely unknown history.
So...The thing to do is prepare for when the SHTF, because it is inevitably coming. The only glue that has held our nation's experiment in self-rule together is the basic morality, honesty, and good will of the citizenry. That glue is no longer there.
45 posted on
02/03/2012 9:05:20 PM PST by
wintertime
(I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
To: satan69
53 posted on
02/04/2012 3:15:47 AM PST by
Dajjal
("I'm not concerned about the very poor." -- Mitt Rmoney)
To: satan69
" There has never been a law on the books created by the Congress, which made it illegal for a common man to practice law. Every Judge of a District, Circuit or Appeal Court, except Justices and Magistrates, is a lawyer and a member of the Bar. These Judges have the authority to establish local rules of court and those mentioned, have created a local rule that prevents common people from representing any other person in their court or to practice law without a license! A license requires that you produce your Bar Association number. For those who dont know, the Bar Association is simply a Lawyers Union, and when lawyers are accepted into the Bar, they are required to swear allegiance to a foreign power! The American Bar Association is a branch of a national organization titled; The National Lawyers Guild Communist Party and can be found recorded in the United States *Code at: [28 U. S. C. 3002, section 15a].* They have become so big and entrenched that they no longer fear reprisal! " http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/usc_sec_28_00003002----000-.html (15) United States means ______(A) a Federal corporation; - - - - - - - http://www.in5d.com/anonymous-judge-blows-the-whistle.html
56 posted on
02/04/2012 4:45:39 AM PST by
SF_Redux
(Sarah stands for accountablility and personal responsiblity, democrats can't live with that)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson