Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Oatka

I’m amazed at how many electoral modes the Framers considered, rejected, reconsidered . . .

I would consider any mode other than direct, popular election. Electors by Congressional district works for me.


24 posted on 02/02/2012 1:48:43 PM PST by Jacquerie (No court will save us from ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Jacquerie

In 1800, Thomas Jefferson argued that Virginia should switch from its then-existing district system of electing presidential electors to the statewide winner-take-all system because of the political disadvantage suffered by states that divided their electoral votes by districts in a political environment in which other states used the winner-take-all approach:
“while 10. states chuse either by their legislatures or by a general ticket [winner-take-all], it is folly & worse than folly for the other 6. not to do it.” [Spelling and punctuation as per original]

Indeed, the now-prevailing statewide winner-take-all system became entrenched in the political landscape in the 1830s precisely because dividing a state’s electoral votes diminishes the state’s political influence relative to states employing the statewide winner-take-all approach.


53 posted on 02/02/2012 2:44:50 PM PST by mvymvy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson