he is not and that was lies by the establishment and Romney and if you want to look more closer then you’;ll see since Romney has been in my state he now said that parts of the dream act is OK with him.
Funny how he attacked Perry on the same issue but now comes here where many immigrants are and he now does another flip flop.
Typical Romney take all sides of an issue and the dumb sheep will follow he thinks
I don’t know who is lying, maybe Newt himself, cause I actually heard him say all those things. Read the quoted article and say that ain’t true. And I am not a huge fan of Mitt either.
“Fifteen years after stopping legislation to get tough on illegal immigration, Gingrich now claims we can’t deport illegal immigrants because they’ve been in this country too long. Gingrich argued at the debate that illegal immigrants who “have been here 25 years,” have children and grandchildren here and who have been “paying taxes and obeying the law” should be allowed to stay.
“I don’t see,” he added, “how the party that says it’s the party of the family is going to adopt a policy that destroys families.”
Setting aside the issue of whether enforcing our nation’s immigration laws is “anti-family,” it’s hard to see why illegal immigrants should be rewarded simply because they have evaded deportation for so long.
As for “obeying the law,” does Gingrich not realize that the illegal immigrant in his hypothetical has been breaking the law every moment of those 25 years that he has been here? Not to mention all the other probable crimes — like identity fraud — that illegal immigrants regularly commit to remain in the United States...”
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/69633.html