Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SWAMPSNIPER

If this affects only his eligibility in Georgia, then at worse, his name would not be on the ballot in Georgia. Since this is a state that he’s not likely to carry anyway, then what happens.........he goes on to win the electoral vote anyway, but lose the popular vote by potential millions because his base voters in Georgia and perhaps a few other red states that do the same thing that were never going to vote for him are “disenfranchised”. Conservatives/GOP would never hear the end of that. Perhaps that’s far fetched, but who knows. Only if this occurs in a deep blue state will any of this matter.


10 posted on 01/26/2012 9:01:17 AM PST by MachIV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MachIV
Do you honestly believe this is the strategy that Obama is pursuing?

How could it possibly be to his advantage, in a public relations sense, not to qualify for the ballot in any state, even **one** state?

17 posted on 01/26/2012 9:04:41 AM PST by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: MachIV

I could not have said it better so I will not try.


19 posted on 01/26/2012 9:05:21 AM PST by vicar7 ("Polls are for strippers and cross-country skiers" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: MachIV

I actually think if any state refuses to put him on the ballot for eligibility reasons, it raises a BIG question in people’s minds all over the country. It gives legitimacy to the issue, and should embolden other states (and Secretaries of State) to do their duty.


24 posted on 01/26/2012 9:08:48 AM PST by Persevero (Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson