Do we really want to have a precedent where any judge anywhere in the US can summon POTUS to appear in his courtroom, for whatever reason the judge decides?
Please. Impertinence befits no one here.
The judge has not come up with "whatever reason." The business before the court is that BHO's name has been requested to be placed on the GA ballot. For this circumstance, GA has rules that indicate the candidate must be eligible for the office being sought, as it should be. In this case, the salient rules are those Constitutionally mandated.
5 GA citizens have implicitly said, "Wait, we have yet to see fully documented qualifications, and the information is in the public domain indicates he's likely not qualified.
Nonetheless, everyone present is happy to give the candidate the opportunity to enlighten the GA officials responsible for ballot placement as to the candidate's true qualifications.
However, if the candidate demurs providing those credentials of qualification, please don't expect GA to assume the burden is upon anyone else or to set aside their own rules to wave on through the candidate's ballot placement, no matter who he thinks he is.
HF