Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625
any judge anywhere in the US can summon POTUS to appear in his courtroom, for whatever reason the judge decides

Please. Impertinence befits no one here.

The judge has not come up with "whatever reason." The business before the court is that BHO's name has been requested to be placed on the GA ballot. For this circumstance, GA has rules that indicate the candidate must be eligible for the office being sought, as it should be. In this case, the salient rules are those Constitutionally mandated.

5 GA citizens have implicitly said, "Wait, we have yet to see fully documented qualifications, and the information is in the public domain indicates he's likely not qualified.

Nonetheless, everyone present is happy to give the candidate the opportunity to enlighten the GA officials responsible for ballot placement as to the candidate's true qualifications.

However, if the candidate demurs providing those credentials of qualification, please don't expect GA to assume the burden is upon anyone else or to set aside their own rules to wave on through the candidate's ballot placement, no matter who he thinks he is.

HF

154 posted on 01/23/2012 6:21:24 PM PST by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]


To: holden
The distinction here is the demand for the President's personal presence, as opposed to his attorney showing up with the documents and Obama's signed notarized statement that he attests under penalty of perjury that these docs are real.

Not that the latter is likely either.

155 posted on 01/24/2012 4:35:25 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson