[bcsco]

Santorum is going nowhere. Newt has the momentum. We need to get behind the candidate that has the momentum to put Romney away, and stand up to the news media and Obama. Santorum needs to drop out after SC.

[yldstrk]

we shall see, won’t we

[TomGuy]

Newt has the momentum. We need to get behind the candidate that has the momentum to put Romney away, and stand up to the news media and Obama.

I do agree that we need to retire Obama, but I have great doubts that Gingrich would win. I keep thinking -- doing the same thing [GOP nomination history] and expecting a different result [GOP winning the election] is the definition of insanity. With Gingrich, the Grand OLD Party has the typical OLD, white-haired guy. It is just McCain-ish and Dole-ish with a bit more hair. Listen to the women calling the talk shows. They do not like him. That translates into a loss in November -- thus, confirming the definition of insanity.

[Matchett-PI]

You wrote: “We need to get behind the candidate that has the momentum to put Romney away, and stand up to the news media and Obama.”

Rush (years ago): “I could sit here all day and take calls from people who are irate over what ‘the drive-by media’ are doing to destroy our conservative candidates, but we’d never get anything else done.” (paraphrased)

Rush quotes:

“Donald Trump is providing _a blueprint_ here: The way to beat Barack Obama in 2012 is to just go at him.” -Rush Limbaugh - Thursday, April 7, 2011

<>

“I’ll tell you this. Whoever in this field takes it to Obama the straightest and the hardest and the most direct, is who’s gonna win. They’re gonna have to take it to Obama. This isn’t a ‘pussy-foot around’ type of election. This is not, ‘Oh, we’ve got to worry about what they’re gonna say about us, we’ve got to worry about PR, about charges of racism.’ Somebody’s got to be willing to take it to Obama. It’s going to be about him and four more years of this stuff and we’ll see if there’s anybody in this field willing to do that.” ~ Rush Limbaugh - March 25th, 2011

HERE: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2818986/posts?page=111#111