Posted on 01/16/2012 11:43:08 PM PST by MaxMax
Paulbots are flooding Drudge Report poll over tonights debate winner.
Here's a good example: On the issue of defense spending, he could have said the money spent on the Iraq embassy is waste, not defense spending and left it at that. He would have actually had a point. However, he was never able to give a concise answer. Instead he verbally roamed around and flailed his arms about. I really expected someone would come out and throw a net over him.
The more he talked, the worse he sounded. Everyone....the moderators, the candidates, and the crowd were embarrassed for him. You should be, as well.
I hate to be contrarian, but...
Drudge polls are meaningless - especially any poll with RuPaul in it. They are merely tools to drive traffic to the site. I don’t see any purpose in playing the game.
That’s the cruelest insult I could think of for poor Matt.
:)
“BTW, did it ever occur to you that Drudge readers simply prefer Paul?”
Nope!
If you watched Paul in the debate and weren't facepalming every meandering, whiny, convoluted answer he gave, you're just not in touch with reality.
With Paulitards that is a given...
yes...! Vote early and often...!
I voted four times...LOL..home comp/tablet on network/smartphone/laptop on network...next..ps3 on network.
5x`s baby! YEAH!...
Go Newt!
You can only vote once.
Supporters of Whine Paul are just as whiny as Paul.
“Drudge polls are meaningless - especially any poll with RuPaul in it. They are merely tools to drive traffic to the site. I don’t see any purpose in playing the game.”
As opposed to one that has small amphibians and mittens in it.
Nope, just any poll of human beings that include Ron Paul.
“Nope, just any poll of human beings that include Ron Paul.”
Don’t you mean RuPaul?
Sure. RuPaul. Crazy Uncle Paul, Muslims-Best-Friend-Ron...
Hey, at least I stayed in the same species.
Admitted, he has warped perceptions on foreign policy. The baby amphibian has warped perceptions of economic policy. They all have warped perceptions of what we will be capable of doing if Paul’s domestic and economic policies are not implemented.
We need an immediate $trillion cut in federal spending, or we can kiss our military superiority goodbye.
We can kiss our military superiority goodbye under Paul.
Past “audit the Fed” there’s not much to Paul.
There’s a lot of good in the overall libertarian position, but Paul is the absolute worst messenger for it. He looked nuts again last night.
He only helps Mitt. It’s a close analogy between Paul and Perot.
BTW: Newt is for a 15% flat tax and reducing spending to meet this revenue.
Paul said zero income tax. A) Won’t happen. B) Would be a disaster.
Sorry, just nuts. Disaster if he’s elected.
“We can kiss our military superiority goodbye under Paul.”
That may be true of all of them, Obama for sertain, but the none of the Republican candidates, Paul, included, inspire much confidence in me. Santorum might. I’m still watching.
“Past “audit the Fed” there’s not much to Paul.”
How about eliminating a bunch of cabinet level departments?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.