First time was a case where Zero's lawyer asked the court to take judicial notice of the "birth announcement" posted online. And went on to say the release of the birth certificate would be embarrassing
Second time was in the Terry Lakin trial. At his trial the presiding judge warned him not to ask for any Obama documents (birth certificate, etc.), for they might prove “embarrassing to the President.”
So tell me what is so embarrassing about his birth certificate? You know, the one he released as an electronic file on the internet claiming it be the LFBC.
Exactly. What reporter has ever asked him what he was so “embarrassed” about from that BC? Should have been the first words out of any real reporter’s lips.
And if Obama would try using the same reason for refusing to present his real documents to get on the GA ballot, it would be even more perplexing - because how could he be “embarrassed” by presenting a document he claimed the entire public has already seen?
I think the Obama team will probably wait to see what the judge is going to demand. If the judge only wants the BC they will trust that the forged one in the HDOH office will suffice and will jump on the chance to have his eligibility decided by a judge BEFORE the Cold Case Posse comes out with ther report. If the judge is smart and honest enough to require an audit of the HDOH’s documents Obama will balk, and his own guilt will be on bright display for all to see.
Orly’s job at the hearing is to show that the HDOH cannot be trusted. They are the ones who need to be on trial at this point, because they are the ones who have what they know to be a forgery in their files. They obviously don’t want to have to show it, or Obama wouldn’t have posted what he did. But it’s there in case they ever do have to show it. And as long as nobody looks at it too deeply or questions the integrity of the HDOH, it might pass as a decent forgery. That’s why Orly’s job right now is critical. She needs to pound home just how compromised the HDOH is and why an audit of the HDOH’s paper, computer, and microfilm records is absolutely necessary.
Here's my guess from way back when...
I believe/know a very few things:
The CoLB that his campaign released is a forgery.
Someone risked jail time to forge this document.
It takes all of half an hour on the 'net, and about $25-$40 to have a legitimate certified copy of your own BC delivered within a week. (I know this because I just did that very thing last month)
Therefore, I conclude that there must be some compelling reason to falsify his BC.
The compelling reason that comes to mind is that the real document would kick him out of the running for being the most powerful man on earth.
From this I conclude that his true documentation shows one or more of the following truths:
• He was not born in the United States, and is therefore constitutionally unqualified for the job. This is a show stopper. There is no way to "fix" this or inoculate himself against this, or win over voters on this issue. It is the premier campaign killer issue.
Therefore, I regard this as the most probable explanation for the deceit.
All the other possible reasons are much lower grade:
• His BC shows that he's a bastard. Although this might be personally embarrassing, nobody cares, a goodly fraction of the electorate is in the same boat, or closely related to someone who is.
• His birth name isn't Barak Hussein Obama. So what? We already know his his name changed when he was adopted in Indonesia. People can and do change their names, it isn't a crime, or even particularly shady.
The only question it really raises is why did he chose a muslim name? That's rather easy to explain away - he took his genetic father's name. Who can argue with that? Especially when muslim names had some popularity among blacks who didn't know just how deeply involved muslims were in the slave trade.
• His real birth certificate lists his father’s race as something other than "African". This would be more of a problem. His whole campaign is founded on his being "the first black president" come January. Still not lethal to the campaign, but it would be awkward to 'splain away.
• There is something else embarrassing on his official BC.
Like what?
There could be nothing conceivably embarrassing about:
His time of birth
His birthday
His city of birth
His county of birth
His island of birth
His religion (Religion is not even listed!)
His mother's race
The date it was filed
A few things could be a slightly embarrassing:
The serial number? Maybe? Suppose it's really 151-1961-000666? Nope. It turned out to be 151-1961-010641
His father's name wasn't listed. Not terribly unlikely if he and Stanley Ann split up before he was born. No one cares.
His mother's maiden name. Suppose she really did use her Anna Toot drinkin' ID to get married? Would that really suffice as a reason for someone to risk jail time by falsifying his documents? More to the point, would it disqualify Barak? I don't think so. If anything it could be played for the sympathy vote, young naïve Stanley Ann trying to do her best in covering up the mistakes of her youth. Mother's maiden name listed as Anna Toot? Yawn.
That leaves the big enchilada:
His birth name. Was it really the noble and exotic Barak Hussein Obama II?
Or was it Mortimer Snerdly Toot, hmmmm?
Live that one down!
One other possibility, but it's so odd I hesitate to mention it:
Approximately 1% of live births are hermaphroditic to a noticeable degree. Perhaps his birth certificate lists him as a girl. (That would explain his pitching and if Larry Sinclair is to be believed, his catching style)...