It kind of comes across as election tampering for Obama’s lawyers to file motions to quash subpoenas for an administrative hearing. The requested documents from Hawaii should theoretically support his eligibility, yet asking to quash the motions suggests Obama doesn’t believe he can prove he is eligible. Things that make you go ... Hmmmmmm.
Yes.
And especially after the judge just got done saying that they HAVE to prove his eligibility in order to get on the ballot. To refuse to let them see the documents that would prove his eligibility for no good reason INDEED smells fishy. They can’t even say that they’re fighting it because it’s a waste of time, an invasion of privacy, etc. - because the judge has said they HAVE to do it in order to get on the ballot.
What legitimate reason would they have for refusing to do that? It’s really the same question as that reporter was asking Jay Carney - what is the REASON for refusing to show educational records? “Just because I can” is the height of arrogance, especially for somebody who’s begging (or should be begging) the nation to trust him and vote for him.
Why should we trust a guy if he could easily put our doubts to rest but instead refuses just because he can?
And when there is real skin off his own back for refusing - such as denying Georgia voters the opportunity to vote for him because his name isn’t on the ballot - even if he would claim laziness or arrogance - the disenfranchisement of an entire state’s voters stinks bad enough that the whole nation should be asking what’s his problem. Because there OBVIOUSLY is a problem here.
When the eligibility thing came up I ignored it UNTIL Obama refused to show his proof in Phil Berg’s suit. There was no reason for him to do that and every reason in the world for him to quell the doubts before the election. That he refused was a LOUD statement of guilt.
In a Fox article after Obama produced the “long-form” forgery a White House official said off the record that Obama was “testy” about signing the consent form requesting a certified copy of his birth certificate. Why should Obama ever be “testy” about requesting the document he claims he posted? There is nothing on there to get testy about. When is any reporter going to ask why Obama would be “testy” about requesting that document?
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck it’s a duck. And Obama looks, walks, and quacks like a guy who knows the documents will prove he’s ineligible.