I can’t keep up with all these cases, but it seems to me if the GA judge required Obama to produce his BC to get on the ballot, it’s up to him/his campaign/representatives to produce the documents. There’d be no need or reason for the other party, i.e., Taitz, to subpoena the records.
Did the judge actually require that? That’s part of my question. That’s what I was led to believe but I’m reading now that a mere subpoena from one state can’t compel the other state to produce. Did the judge say that Obama will be left off the ballot if those pieces of evidence are not presented to the court?