Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sten
my question is... exactly who did the due diligence to verify that the candidates presented to the voters were in fact eligible to assume office.

If memory serves me right, it was Nancy Pelosi, who should be impeached for perjury.

4 posted on 01/11/2012 7:23:51 PM PST by Publius6961 (My world was lovely, until it was taken over by parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Publius6961

actually, it is wholly inadequate to trust the word from the head of the party that would benefit from the fraud. if anything, candidates should be vetted by the opposing party

failing that... it would be on the governor to fulfill his duty to uphold the Constitution by checking the basic requirements (it’s not like we’re asking for a balanced budget... it’s the same level Id check anyone would do for a passport).

if the governor was given the names, which were vouched for as being eligible by a neutral 3rd party... then it’s on the 3rd party that supposedly did the vetting. who would this uninterested 3rd party be is the question


6 posted on 01/11/2012 7:46:39 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson