Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/06/2012 9:40:15 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Signalman

Really?

While the EPA is causing perfectly good power plants to shut down and incandescent light bulbs have disappeared from store shelves.

Yeah, dead in the water. < /sarc >


2 posted on 01/06/2012 9:44:03 AM PST by Yankee (ANNOY THE RNC AND THE MEDIA: NOMINATE NEWT GINGRICH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman; ApplegateRanch; Berlin_Freeper; Genesis defender; golux; proud_yank; Bockscar; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

3 posted on 01/06/2012 9:45:17 AM PST by steelyourfaith (If it's "green" ... it's crap !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

That’s what they want you to think.


4 posted on 01/06/2012 9:46:03 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

The market is telling us that the environmental laws we have in place are sufficient to protect the public to the extent they want to be protected and the cost of being protected. Enviro-whackos seek to use government to impose rules and regulations that are often impractical and the cost of which the public considers stupid or onerous, and they don’t like it. It’s like a religion to these people. They would like nothing better than to decimate the untermensch so they and their favored friends can enjoy a pristine environment that we haven’t seen since Adam & Eve. Not gonna happen.


5 posted on 01/06/2012 9:49:28 AM PST by bopdowah ("Unlike King Midas, whatever the Gubmint touches sure don't turn to Gold!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

If the ship is dead in the water, ins’t that a prime opportunity to sink it?


6 posted on 01/06/2012 9:50:18 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

The Green movement will never die. In part, because good stewardship of the environment is a legitimate goal.

What has suffered a major setback is not the advance of legitimate environmental protections but the hijacking of the green movement through the use of dishonest and junk science to further political aims that really have nothing to do with the environment.


7 posted on 01/06/2012 9:52:54 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Green is the new brown.


9 posted on 01/06/2012 9:56:41 AM PST by Leep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

On Earth Day in 1970, I was the only kid being driven to school on diesel-powered bus 69. I can report that Roy, the driver, carefully passed the throngs of walking students without comment.


11 posted on 01/06/2012 9:59:55 AM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman
I think it's a good analytical piece about the political tactic and commercial influence the greenies pressed and it's effect.

I think the authors intentionally left out the actual science or arguments of the opposing ideologies.

Either intentionally or accidentally, the implication is that the movement could have succeeded (still might depending on 2012 elections) regardless of the substance or scientific truth had it been more moderately managed.

AND THAT IS SCARY.

15 posted on 01/06/2012 10:08:31 AM PST by Tenacious 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

17 posted on 01/06/2012 10:16:46 AM PST by perfect_rovian_storm (Perry's idea of border control: Use both hands to welcome the illegals right in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Central planning fails and fails and fails, but they keep trying.

Proverbs 27:22


20 posted on 01/06/2012 10:19:39 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

I wonder why there was no mention anywhere in this piece about the Climategate emails and the systemic faking of data to fit the AGW alarmists’ agenda ...


21 posted on 01/06/2012 10:21:16 AM PST by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Certainly their cars don’t go anywhere....

http://nlpc.org/stories/2011/12/29/taxpayers-leaf-four-recharging-stops-needed-go-180-miles


22 posted on 01/06/2012 10:23:28 AM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Well, keep pouring fire into it until it sinks, then machine gun the survivors in the water.


26 posted on 01/06/2012 10:56:20 AM PST by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Part of their problem is that their general method to enforce a “pristine” environmental standard is to use government as the billy club to bludgeon its citizens with.

When you lose your property because of a puddle of water or a frog lives on it, there is no rationale to justify that kind predatory behavior by an out of control government.

People get a general sense of the absurdity and corrupt behavior of government because of this.


28 posted on 01/06/2012 11:03:02 AM PST by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman
It didn’t help that 31,000 scientists rejected the notion of man-made global warming in a letter signed and circulated two weeks before the start of the Senate debate.

The above was the turning point.

When the false threat of global warming was, well confirmed as false; then the modern environmental movement began to unravel.

The greens have done some good. I don't want 1970s LA smog to return. I want a Hudson River that does not carry garbage and poison. Etc.

We did not need a green movement to get this. Common sense is enough.

The idea that we can predict, let alone contol climate; long term; is over the top loss of reality.

29 posted on 01/06/2012 11:15:02 AM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson