Replies

Freepers, can someone refute these comments on youtube that accompany the cited video? I know nothing about these things and would appreaciate an experts opinion. This person, danyoip, had the last say. Is he right or wrong? (The top comment is the latest, the bottom the earliest). Thanks. "@groov539 the layers were not made with photoshop, it was illustrator. since you dont know how these program works, you should learn the difference between the 2 first. these are not editable layers which means they were not created un illustrator or photoshop. but they were copied and pasted, quite obviously from the same doc. ask someone who really knows graphic design. danyoip Now we know.. The original birth certificate said ONLY "Ann Dunham" as the mother.. A SINGLE mother at the time of 0bama's birth. groov539 "unham Obama" was ADDED to Barack's birth certificate. It was ORIGINALLY "Ann Dunham". The forger decided to rescript the "unham" over the existing "Dunham" so that the addition of "Obama" would be more BELIEVABLE. Think it about and it makes perfect sense. Adding only "Obama" to the end of "Ann Dunham" would be too obviously fraudulent wouldn't it... groov539 from my 13 years of experience as a digital artist. I think this certificate was printed with some sort of ink on a patterned paper. the ink faded as the time went by. The guy who enhanced this certificate separated the faded inked text with it's original layers. Then in began to darken the layer probably just adding contrast or just did a path around the black and filled it in with black. he was sloppy but you can obviously see in box 22. "date a aug" is an unnecessary layer. U lose. danyoip "