Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye
Freepers, can someone refute these comments on youtube that accompany the cited video? I know nothing about these things and would appreaciate an experts opinion. This person, danyoip, had the last say. Is he right or wrong? (The top comment is the latest, the bottom the earliest). Thanks. "@groov539 the layers were not made with photoshop, it was illustrator. since you dont know how these program works, you should learn the difference between the 2 first. these are not editable layers which means they were not created un illustrator or photoshop. but they were copied and pasted, quite obviously from the same doc. ask someone who really knows graphic design. danyoip Now we know.. The original birth certificate said ONLY "Ann Dunham" as the mother.. A SINGLE mother at the time of 0bama's birth. groov539 "unham Obama" was ADDED to Barack's birth certificate. It was ORIGINALLY "Ann Dunham". The forger decided to rescript the "unham" over the existing "Dunham" so that the addition of "Obama" would be more BELIEVABLE. Think it about and it makes perfect sense. Adding only "Obama" to the end of "Ann Dunham" would be too obviously fraudulent wouldn't it... groov539 from my 13 years of experience as a digital artist. I think this certificate was printed with some sort of ink on a patterned paper. the ink faded as the time went by.  The guy who enhanced this certificate separated the faded inked text with it's original layers. Then in began to darken the layer probably just adding contrast or just did a path around the black and filled it in with black. he was sloppy but you can obviously see in box 22. "date a aug" is an unnecessary layer. U lose. danyoip "
22 posted on 01/05/2012 4:30:29 AM PST by Mimi3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Mimi3

Sorry, can’t fix the bad formatting in my previous message.


23 posted on 01/05/2012 4:34:08 AM PST by Mimi3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Mimi3

At the link I provided he has three followup videos that answer questions and criticisms he received.


31 posted on 01/05/2012 2:04:46 PM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Mimi3
Mimi, you were great in that opera with the fat guy.

Now about these documents. We are simply not ever going to know exactly what the heck document the lawyer The Mombasa Chappie sent to Honolulu got from the DOH.

Suffice it to say it was not a "Certified Copy of a Birth Certificate." The DOH described it as an "Abstract of Data on File." The White House admitted as much for about the first 15 minutes.

What they haven't admitted in so many words is that they or someone took the contents of that document and rearranged them in a more presentable form (from their POV)and digitally created what the MSM obligingly accepted as a copy of the BC, and printed it on more "official" looking stock, or just put the stock pattern in their digital doc.

No big deal, any good MAC driver in any graphic arts studio or Kinko's in Anytown, USA coulda done it. And Mimi, it certainly was good enough for Government Work.

Any elected Republican official will tell you that "he was born in Hawaii." You, I, and Sheriff Joe know better. Team Obama is going to brazen this out. The heck with Superbowl. Let's see who wins this shootout!

32 posted on 01/06/2012 10:42:38 AM PST by Kenny Bunk ((So, you're telling me Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out this eligibility stuff?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson