Posted on 01/01/2012 10:53:57 AM PST by TBBT
KNOXVILLE, Iowa – Even before votes are cast here, movement conservatives across the country are beginning to fear that 2012 will be a replay of the last GOP presidential primary: conservatives divided between candidates, enabling a center-right contender to march up the middle and claim the nomination. Time is running short on activist Republicans who have long yearned for a unifying Mitt Romney alternative in the race – leading some to worry that if they don’t stop him in Iowa on Tuesday, they may not be able to stop him at all.
Rick Santorum’s late surge in Iowa, coupled with the apparent determination of Rick Perry and Newt Gingrich to make a three-week stand through South Carolina, could augur for a bloody, multi-party battle on the right while Romney rides strength in Iowa and New Hampshire. That’s led some movement veterans to call for the base to rally around whichever conservative does best in the caucuses on Tuesday — a distinction that polls are showing is likely to go to Santorum. “I could see the conservative movement coalescing around somebody that comes out of Iowa strong and sort of becomes the conservative candidate out of Iowa and into New Hampshire,” said conservative strategist Greg Mueller, a onetime adviser to the Pat Buchanan and Steve Forbes campaigns. “You could see conservatives nationally start to call on the movement, which is not a monolithic thing, to encourage their supporters to get behind the one candidate who might have a shot at winning.”
It's not rocket science, but the LSM/Elite GOP are attempting to crate momentum where it is not.
I believe that this is the first time that "the people" are aware of the tactical B.S. and will not put up with it.
Would the Conservatives be willing to sacrifice another 4 years of Obama to prove a point (while electing more conservatives down ballot)?? I, personally have not made up my mind yet on this tactic, but I would like to hear what others think.
Iowa caucuses pick delegates to county conventions and begin compiling a party platform. No delegates are committed to a candidate. All the angst is over a secret, non-binding presidential preference vote where attendees write any name they want on a blank sheet of paper. Iowa doesn’t choose delegates to the national convention (which chooses the nominee) until June.
Newt should just give the middle finger to both those pathetic states.
Stop wasting time and money on people this full of it.
History lesson, dude:
Thompson had one job only in SC..
Take out the conservative Huck for his pal, the mushy MODERATE McCain by splitting the conservative vote WITH HUCK.
If Huck beats liberal Teddy Kennedy clone, Willard by 10 in IA (as he did) and beats McCain in SC (missed it by a measly 3%), Moderate McCain and Liberal Willy are toast!
The poster is a seminar poster. Just look at the posting history.
Right on cue : )
yeah. the problem is that by then, the breathless MSM coverage has moved on. the danger isn’t iowa’s delegates in the first place — there just aren’t that many if them.
the problem is the hype. and it’s especially pernicious this year with the compressed early primary schedule.
Exactly.
I hate this elitist evangelical bashing.
I have only one vote. And as an evangelical, I can promise you it will NEVER go to Romney. So I am NOT responsible if Romney happens to win my state's primary.
It's that simple.
Is it a result of the Northeasterners moving south for retirement?
I don’t know if that’s true or not. But I DO know that Huckster is nothing approaching a conservative....so to me it was Huck, McCain and Romney all pretending to be conservatives against Thompson who actually WAS a conservative.
Hank
Hope New Hampshire didn't spend all that revenue they thought they were going to collect from that 9% meal and lodging tax this time around...
So because your candidate sucks we should vote for him instead of the one who best represents us?
No sale.
Was a Fredhead then, McCain won because he was the most conservative of the remaining batch.
Huckster and Slick Williard were to his left. If the McCain folks had gotten behind Fred, we’d have President Fred and a very different world today.
Now today - Newt = McCain, Mitt = Mitt. Santorum = Fred. Perry = Huckster.
So why would I vote for the loser, again? If I wanted someone who would lose I’d vote for Paul.
I disagree, respectively. FR is a microcosm of the general electorate. We, being FR, are more aware than most of political issues, etc. The general populace is not, yet this time around, they are taking harder stances for what they want. coupled with the increased GOP/Independent party affiliations it makes more sense, to me, that the general awareness is higher than at any time. IMO.
Good job (but the middle two are the same fyi).
Check the internals in IA and SC. Huck dominated Lazy Fred among conservatives by two to one.
So I’m sure your definition of true conservative is incorrect.
But hey, if you liked McCain over Huck — Conservatives in IA & SC will just overwhelmingly disagree with your view. No biggie. Moderates like you are welcome in the R camp, too.
"I meant to do that. I've always been a supporter of dual-posting the ones in the middle. That's what I intended to do. I've never posted the identical animated .gifs side by side. Any reports of me posting two identical ones in the middle are false and slanderous political attacks." ~ Willard Mitt Romney
5th and 6th place finishers don’t get tickets out of Iowa.........................................................................................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.