Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dayglored

While this is most likely a Microsoft issue, it is possible that Safari installed itself in such a way to access Ring 0.


23 posted on 12/21/2011 10:56:45 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: for-q-clinton
> While this is most likely a Microsoft issue, it is possible that Safari installed itself in such a way to access Ring 0.

While I suppose you could argue that it's theoretically possible that's what happened here, the fact is, it's not what happened here. Microsoft is scrambling to fix their vulnerability, instead of pointing a finger back at Apple, so we know for sure it's a Microsoft issue. Otherwise, MS would have a field day with Apple's application error.

I can't say with authority that Windows Safari stays out of Ring 0 -- it might throw some driver in the kernel, I don't know offhand. But an IFRAME tag causing a large memory request is not a Ring 0 kernel kind of a problem. No application memory allocation request should ever cause a bluescreen. And Microsoft will find it and fix it, they're bright folks.

Nice try, no dice.

49 posted on 12/22/2011 12:00:32 AM PST by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson