To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Twice, this guy mentions McCarthy.
Is that the new meme?
2 posted on
12/20/2011 9:46:11 PM PST by
Old Sarge
(RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
To: NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; SierraWasp; tubebender; Marine_Uncle; GeronL; SunkenCiv; blam; ...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Rush Limbaugh; TitansAFC
LOL. This guy wants Rush’s attention before he leaves for Christmas vacation.....!
GO GINGRICH.
5 posted on
12/20/2011 9:54:36 PM PST by
onyx
(PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC:DONATE MONTHLY! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
If I remember my schooling concerning the Constitution (Long long ago) Federal judges (even SC judges) can be impeached.
Also, the Supreme Court is NOT the final say on what the law says. There are three branches and if the President and Congress disagree with the Supreme Court, the court loses!!
6 posted on
12/20/2011 10:04:27 PM PST by
Crazy ole coot
(Mr. obama (the squatter in the White House) is Not a Natural Born Citizen!!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Well...geee...some of the “Courts” have had a WAR on the Constitution and America. ‘bout time we fought back.
7 posted on
12/20/2011 10:05:20 PM PST by
goodnesswins
(Banning Christmas (and Christmas decorations) is something that commies do.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Leave it to a lawyer to get the Constitution Wrong. The Judicial Branch has been in over reach for over a century. The Congress and The President can exert their authority over the Judicial Branch BECAUSE they are the direct representatives of the people and the collective states. They are the weakest branch of the three and where supposed to be the least influential to the public, BECAUSE they serve for life.
Due to the massive over reach a good Constitutional Schooling is due the Judiciary and that means a smack down from the Legislature and the Executive branches taking back their respective authority to make law and eliminate and remove judges who act contrary to the Constitution that they swear to uphold. They have every authority to remove and eliminate judges both individualy and collectively by changing the courts and or adding or eliminating entire districts. The Courts where set up by the Legislature and signed into law by the Execiutive. They are not suposed to be an oligarchy but they believe that they are.
9 posted on
12/20/2011 10:13:09 PM PST by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
While I may not agree 100% with ALL of Newt’s ideas, it is past time that someone took on our corrupted, perverted, nonfunctioning court system.
The left has used the courts for decades to pervert the law AND the will of the people.
There needs to be some accounting for the poor decisions that have come out of too many of our courts. Perhaps Newt is really on the right track, here.
11 posted on
12/20/2011 10:16:13 PM PST by
DustyMoment
(Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; JesusBmyGod; buffyt; Whenifhow; rom; persistence48; Hanna548; DvdMom; ...
I am heavily offended by this tripe!
I have listened to rush every single day, for every hour is show has been broadcast. Ever since he was still broadcasting in Sacramento I have listened to him, minus a vacation now and then, or when I was too sick to stay awake to hear anything. So when I read this quote from the article,
..............what Rush is first and foremost is a showman and a businessman who knows that controversy is good, attracts more listeners and gets people talking about him.
I could only come up with one conclusion, neither Mr Shaw nor Ed Morrissey, have ever listened to Rush for more than a few episodes after the MSM has brought his name up. That being said I just lost a
TON of respect for these two writers at HotAir. From hence forth I will never ever read another article written by them, because they are not conservatives, they are RINOS at best like George Will.
No true conservative would consider Rush just another showman who is looking to just get ratings, and awareness by being controversial. True conservatives will always get attention by just being truthful. Something Liberals and Rinos, like Mr Shaw and Morrisey would never understand, because they always put their fingers in the air to see which way the wind is blowing before commenting on a subject.
12 posted on
12/20/2011 10:19:43 PM PST by
OneVike
(Just a Christian waiting to go home)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
subpoenaing judges is neither legal nor workable. Says who. Congress subpoenas executive branch officials all the time. Why should the judiciary be any different?
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
So does this mean that, deep down, Limbaugh is a racist or whatever? The answer is probably no . . . . Deep down, is the author an idiot? The answer is probably yes.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
But every once in a while he lets slip with something that gets the liberal blogosphere and the MSM setting their hair on fire.The "Magic Negro" song comes to mind. That was all started by a black journalist at some paper, but was attributed to Rush. I agree with Newt on this issue and some judges / courts should be impeached. The 9th circus is a prime example.
21 posted on
12/21/2011 5:23:57 AM PST by
Arrowhead1952
(Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson