Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

HE SAYS THEY DON'T REPRESENT HIS VIEWS.

Click above link for the rest...

1 posted on 12/20/2011 12:27:12 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Ron Paul is going to be joined at the hip with Lew Rockwell if he somehow wins.


2 posted on 12/20/2011 12:29:38 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Brilliant pull quote: If Ron Paul is so libertarian that he won't even police people who use his name, if his movement is filled with incompetents and opportunists, then what kind of a president would he make?
3 posted on 12/20/2011 12:35:14 PM PST by svcw (God's Grace - thank you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

4 posted on 12/20/2011 12:37:33 PM PST by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The may not represent his views.

But I question the veracity of a man who says he does not know WHO wrote letters under his name, published by him.

I can’t imagine any case where you would publish something without knowing who wrote it.

Did Ron find this stuff written on scrolls that appeared on his porch?

You can’t be president if you don’t know who’ writing inflammatory stuff you “happen” to publish.

So no matter who wrote it, Ron’s either a DOLT or a RACIST.


5 posted on 12/20/2011 12:40:11 PM PST by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
newsletters that went out under his name

I understand he was the publisher. Suggesting that he was only peripherally involved is silly. Does anyone think this sort of cr@p might have gone out in National Review while Wm Buckley was alive? The closest thing I can recall to this is the stuff that Pat Buchanan wrote. In response to criticism Buckley devoted an entire issue to consider the question: Is Patrick Buchanan anti-Semitic? For Ron Paul, everything in his newsletter was peaches and cream.

But I guess it's more important for the MSM to smear the good men.

ML/NJ

7 posted on 12/20/2011 12:43:20 PM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The Democrats wouldn’t have an opposition file on Paul, they’d have an opposition warehouse.


9 posted on 12/20/2011 12:44:18 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
* "Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal."

Yeah that one crosses the line. In fact it's flat out wrong, while their certainly are many poor black families in DC, there are also many upper-middle class ones (mostly federal employees) who think about as much of the lower class criminal blacks as any other race.

* "We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, it is hardly irrational."

I assume the writer was refering to the higher rates of crime among black men, while this was poorly phrased. I think it was aimed more a political correctness than race.

* After the Los Angeles riots, one article in a newsletter claimed, "Order was only restored in L.A. when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks."

Andrew Dice Clay should sue Ron Paul for plagarism, I remember this joke in his routine back in the 1990's.

* One referred to Martin Luther King Jr. as "the world-class philanderer who beat up his paramours" and who "seduced underage girls and boys"

It's not polite to talk about since society has decided to deify MLK, but most serious biographers would admit this is at least partially true.

* Another referred to Barbara Jordan, a civil rights activist and congresswoman as "Barbara Morondon," the "archetypical half-educated victimologist."

Yeah, that sounds like her, although the "Morondon" was a little juvenile.

* Other newsletters had strange conspiracy theories about homosexuals, the CIA, and AIDS.

Well this IS from Ron Paul, what do you expect?

10 posted on 12/20/2011 12:44:36 PM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I would NEVER vote for Paul (in the primaries)...he sits behind Romney in my view.

but most of what the quotes represent sound like sociological studies not racist rambling by Paul...

just my $0.02


11 posted on 12/20/2011 12:45:13 PM PST by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Never mind that some of it might actually be true...

We must all take turns beating our breast and proclaiming loudly that we too carry water for “diversity”.


12 posted on 12/20/2011 12:48:56 PM PST by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Thats almost as screwy as someone sitting in church for 20 years while your minister spewed racist anti-american non-sense and yet you claim you didn’t know anything about it.
Who in their right mind would believe that?
Oh,wait..nevermind.


13 posted on 12/20/2011 12:48:56 PM PST by Leep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
HE SAYS THEY DON'T REPRESENT HIS VIEWS.

YES, WE KNOW. PAULBOTS HAVE BEEN SAYING THAT BEFORE THE BI-BLOG JUST RE-HASHED THE SAME STORY!

Click above link for the rest...

Why? The bi-blog isn't on the excerpt-only list. Is the bi-blog paying you?

14 posted on 12/20/2011 12:51:42 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I’ll be watching this to see if any of the Paul cult koolaid drinkers respond. So far they avoid the issue, call the newsletters fake or say they don’t care.


15 posted on 12/20/2011 12:51:56 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
I'm no ron paul supporter because of his foreign policy views but I don't believe he is a racist.

His defense, "I didn't do it, and I don't know who did it and I don't agree with it but I didn't know it was being done," sounds like eric holder testifying before congress about fast and furious.

Both of them are lying about some aspect of what happened.

Holder knew and Paul knew.

Maybe neither one sold a gun nor wrote a word, but being in charge, means just saying, "I take full responsibility", means it's your ass on the line and you take the punishment that comes with the screw up.

19 posted on 12/20/2011 1:00:38 PM PST by USS Alaska (Merry Christmas-Nuke The Terrorist Savages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Looks like even CBS is picking up on the Ron Paul racism:

Ron Paul disavows racist newsletters under his name

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57345702-503544/ron-paul-disavows-racist-newsletters-under-his-name/

Time for the GOP to throw that crackpot bum out once and for all.


20 posted on 12/20/2011 1:01:50 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Well, thats 'one' real story on the newsletters that went out under Ron Paul's name; that he made millions of dollars from; that contained extremely racist (not race-card racist, but 'd*mn, that man's a racist' racist) articles for years and years, but Ron was blissfully unaware that they did, or that they were attracting a certain following, or Neo-Nazi fundraisers, or he didn't care, or it would be resolved when the great battle on the plains of Griffindor took place against the Trilateralists, or we would be protected from the rays when we wore our tinfoil porkpie hats.

Actually, I've read a dozen totally different "authorized" "real stories" from "I know Ron Paul and the real story and the real person who wrote these articles on an unauthorized basis and dang-it he even kept writing after Dr. Pauls said don't write them and he had to publish them because they were written and our erasers were stolen by the crypto fascists from Albania" Ron Paul supporters. Paul is either a racist or too incompetent to be President. Or a nut. Or all three. I'm betting on the trifecta.

21 posted on 12/20/2011 1:02:05 PM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Written by him or not, Ron Paul owns their content. One letter slipping out with the subsequent firing of the writer, return of cash received from the letter, and an apology to all recipients at the time would make this a non issue. An “I know nothing” response for newsletters published over multiple decades under his name, by his people, and with cash flowing into Ron Paul campaign coffers supports compliance and incompetence.

Oust Ron Paul NOW!

23 posted on 12/20/2011 1:07:48 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
As crazy as it sounds, Ron Paul's newsletter writers may not have been sincerely racist at all. They actually thought appearing to be racist was a good political strategy in the 1990s. After that strategy yielded almost nothing - it was abandoned by Paul's admirers.

Misses the point, so far as Murray Rothbard was concerned though. Rothbard was always going to extremes. He had an insensitivity about things like this. It was part of who he was. And it didn't change or go away.

Nobody would seriously expect Rothbard to be a convinced and committed racist, but that blind spot about slavery and segregation was pretty glaring. You could say something similar about Rockwell. And Paul? Hard to say.

24 posted on 12/20/2011 1:15:50 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Most of what he says in these quotes, and a few others I’ve seen, are true, or nearly true, with some mild exaggeration.

They just aren’t politically correct.

But not very smart for anyone to say who is planning to run for President.

Now Paul is denying any responsibility for saying these things. Well, it was his newsletter, so he’s responsible, whether he wrote them or not. I think he probably did.

So, say something largely true but politically correct, and then lie about it. Or, from the leftist point of view, speak like a racist. They will continue to hit him with this.

Martin Luther King WAS a womanizer. I think I recall that he had two affairs on the day he died. And he plagiarized his Harvard thesis. He wasn’t a bad guy, in many ways, but he had these little problems. And toward the time of his death, he was becoming a rabble rouser in places like Dearborn, unfortunately.


26 posted on 12/20/2011 1:20:09 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Ron Paul is like a guy who drives a bank robbery get-away car for 15 years and then denies knowing that his gang was robbing banks all those times he was sitting outside.


27 posted on 12/20/2011 1:21:28 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Paul, Rockwell, and Rothbard are/were JBS-style, “old right” palaeolibertarians with a fixation on the evils of “Zionism.”


28 posted on 12/20/2011 1:22:57 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Ki-hagoy vehamamlakhah 'asher lo'-ya`avdukh yove'du; vehagoyim charov yecheravu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson