[Windflier]

It pains me to come to Romney’s defense regarding your ignorant comments about him. You have obviously not watched the debates or have chosen to ignore his debate comments which place him to the right of everyone except Bachmann and Santorum.

Which is more ignorant - judging a candidate by his record, or judging him by what he says in debates?

...Romney and all the others for that matter would be superior to Obama.

Like I said the first time, a Romney presidency would be only marginally better than a second Obama term. He's a liberal statist who wouldn't know a core value if it bit him in the ass. Stop listening to what he says, and read up on his record. The man is Obama-Lite.

[secondamendmentkid]

“Which is more ignorant - judging a candidate by his record, or judging him by what he says in debates?”

So therefore we shouldn’t listen to Newt’s amnesty for wetbacks from the debates? Also, there is not a lot of shining armor in Newt’s record. You have failed to respond to my refutation of your “marginally better” BS. Therefore, a continued discourse with you is fruitless. Focus some of your hatred at Obama, he is the real enemy.