Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenKenobi
Why it was not subversive or it was?

And which book? I have read most of his stuff but I am always ready to find something new.

10 posted on 12/13/2011 10:26:54 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (*Philosophy lesson 117-22b: Anyone who demands to be respected is undeserving of it.*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Nothing subtle and nothing new. The Kingdom of Christ was not of this world and the Romans only knew of this world -the tangible. Thus whatever Mark wrote was subversive (in speaking about the new Kingdom and new King) and it would not have mattered in which place or time he lived.


11 posted on 12/13/2011 10:37:48 PM PST by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

It, along with Judaism would never have been accepted.

The everlasting man talks about this point in Christian history where the Romans were perfectly willing to have Apollo = Christ. That even became the official religion of the Empire, thanks to Marcion, but it FAILED.


12 posted on 12/14/2011 5:56:09 AM PST by BenKenobi (Honkeys for Herman! 10 percent is enough for God; 9 percent is enough for government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson