[ransomnote]

there have been, in the past, bits of information that point to a nuclear explosion. For example, debris from the reactor is photographed being ejected. Determining where the object landed and back calculating, based on it's weight, how fast the object traveled along its trajectory when ejected renders force in excess of that generated by a hydrogen explosion. I wonder if a nuclear explosion would partly explain why the official radiation contamination map for Japan shows the entire nation is contaminated - could a hydrogen explosion do that?

[ransomnote]

forgot to post the link to the map I posted in the comments:
http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/12/professor-hayakawas-fukushima-chernobyl.html

[J Aguilar]

I thought Japan had more than one island.

The situation is indeed improving there, since all such supersticious comments are focusing more and more on the power plant.

[reed13k]

it’s interesting you post the chrenobyl comparison as I’ve never heard anything related to a ‘nuclear explosion’ there and only of a runaway fire with corresponding ash debris. yet the two maps appear to be comparable - the japanese reduced areas likely due to the more stable design of the reactors and the prevailing winds taking a large amount of the radiation out to sea.

As I mentioned to someone else between the govt/company coverup and the liberal anti-nuc press bias it’s difficult to tell if any information hasn’t been corrupted by the time it gets to print.