Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE BAMBINO clears the fences at the Iowa debate!
Politico ^ | 12/11/2011 | Roger Simon

Posted on 12/12/2011 6:26:46 AM PST by nikos1121

The Bambino stands in the center of the stage, untouchable, uncatchable, unbeatable. He is Newt Gingrich, and he has become the Sultan of Swat.

It is Saturday night at yet another Republican debate and — wham! wham! wham! — Gingrich keeps blasting them out of the park.

Mitt Romney claims he should be president, because, unlike Newt, Romney is not a “career politician.”

“Let’s be candid,” Newt replies. “The only reason you didn’t become a career politician is that you lost to Ted Kennedy in 1994.”

Wham!

Newt, like the real Bambino, Babe Ruth, is a man of appetites. For food and for women, to name just two.

But when the moderators at the ABC News/Yahoo! debate in Des Moines ask all the candidates whether “marital infidelity” is important as an issue, the new Bambino does not quiver or quail. He does not flinch. He does not duck the pitch even though he has had three wives and admits to having been an adulterer.

“It is a real issue,” Newt says firmly. “People have to look at the person to whom they are going to loan the presidency.”

Loan the presidency! A wonderful phrase that lingers in the mind. And now the Bambino steps into the pitch.

“I have said upfront, openly, I have made mistakes at times and had to go to God for forgiving,” he says.

Whammo! It is out of here!

It is an answer that is perfectly acceptable to almost all Christian conservatives. Who can be against redemption? And do we not love the sinner more than the saint because who amongst us has not sinned? (Only the media, that is, who constantly cast the first stone.)

In earlier debates, Newt has appeared haughty and above it all. But with that answer he returns to earth. He has feet of clay like the rest of us and asks the Almighty to forgive him. And so the fidelity question does not destroy him, but makes him.

And, make no mistake, what he is doing this Saturday night is difficult. Mitt Romney, who had done so well at staying above the fray in previous debates, crashes and burns in this one.

Romney lets Rick Perry get his goat. Rick Perry, who has as much chance of getting the Republican nomination as Luke Perry! Or Perry Como!

When Rick Perry insists that Romney has changed his position on something or other, Mitt angrily sticks out his hand and says, “Rick, I’ll tell you what, ten thousand bucks? $10,000 bet?”

Way to go, Mitt. Remind America that $10,000 is chump change to you.

And when Michele Bachmann says that Mitt and Newt are just clones, Mitt decides to be cute. It is a mistake.

“I know Newt Gingrich,” Romney smirks. “And he is a friend of mine. But we are not clones.”

Yes, Mitt, you are tall and handsome standing there next to Newt. We can all see that. Newt looks like a sack of doorknobs compared to you.

But what does that get you, Mitt? How does that make you presidential?

Newt eyes Romney like the Bambino used to eye a high fastball. He will soon gets his chance to whack another one.

Gingrich, an historian, has called the Palestinians an “invented people.” Nobody asks him whether Americans “invented” themselves in 1776, however.

Instead, Romney says that Gingrich has gone too far and that he should let Israel negotiate for itself.

Newt stabs the lectern with his finger as he roars back. “These people are terrorists!” he says. “They teach terrorism in their schools! It’s fundamentally time for someone to have the guts to stand up and say: ‘Enough lying about the Middle East!’ ”

The audience, as audiences do, goes wild.

If it were four years ago, I would be writing that as soon as Newt wins an actual caucus or primary, the Republican establishment will rise up and stop him. But, today, there is no Republican establishment. It has been washed away by the Tea Party.

And the Tea Party likes a long-ball hitter.

Saturday was Newt’s night. A few more nights like this — and a few actual victories at the polls — and it could be his nomination.

Roger Simon is POLITICO’s chief political columnist.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Humor; Local News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: debates; newt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: humblegunner

I know, sorry. I just love the article and the nickname.


21 posted on 12/12/2011 6:57:34 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
You posted this same thread yesterday. Got memory problems?

BUSTED! Good work there Officer HumbleGunner. What is the penalty for posting the same article twice anyways? Doesn't happen often.

22 posted on 12/12/2011 6:58:38 AM PST by McGruff (Hold the House, retake the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

Wow...can’t believe MSNBC would put this out.


23 posted on 12/12/2011 7:00:58 AM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

You newt lovers are in serious trouble. What are you thinking? This guy is more washington establishment than pelosi


24 posted on 12/12/2011 7:05:06 AM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: astounded

“Sack of door knobs”! Hilarious! LOL! I found such an image endearing. What a term! That may stick for awhile. Sweet.


25 posted on 12/12/2011 7:11:53 AM PST by RitaOK (wRasmussen- the polling standard for accuracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather

America wants and needs an adult in charge. With his confident style, white hair, the around the block past, he’s like the grey headed airline pilot you want at the controls when a plane is in trouble. We don’t need an untried reformer or even a solid Conservative mentor who might be inflexible. We need a fellow who can lie with the best of them, twist arms, and be a real leader and not an ideological fanatic (we have that now).


26 posted on 12/12/2011 7:29:45 AM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather

“”This guy is more washington establishment than pelosi””

So?

So he knows the ropes and can play the game- and win.

All I care about is- what would he use that power to fight for?


27 posted on 12/12/2011 7:32:41 AM PST by getitright (If you call this HOPE, can we give despair a shot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore; McGruff

Yes, great picture, complements of McGruff!!!!!!


28 posted on 12/12/2011 8:19:46 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

>“Let’s be candid,” Newt replies. “The only reason you didn’t become a career politician is that you lost to Ted Kennedy in 1994.”<

This quote is far better than “I knew Jack Kennedy”, much to the MSM’s great distress.


29 posted on 12/12/2011 8:23:30 AM PST by Darnright ("I don't trust liberals, I trust conservatives." - Lucius Annaeus Seneca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darnright

I really enjoyed this last debate....


30 posted on 12/12/2011 11:50:13 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather

I’m in good company. Read some of Jim Rob’s postings and threads. Newt isn’t the best...but

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2818373/posts

nuff said


31 posted on 12/12/2011 12:48:48 PM PST by ThomasMore (Islam is the Whore of Babylon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore

You’re spot on there. I decided for Newt about four weeks ago. I’ve no remorse thus far. The man is not perfect, and the MSM will looking at every possible way to go after him, (e.g. taking the comment on the Palestinians.)

I read daily the bickering on this site about the various candidates, and I was really getting despondent about it, and then Jim’s posting came out.

Since then, I’ve sensed a real coalition here, that basically tells me we’re going to be united here, and we’re going to beat Obama and his minions.

You know, Newt’s comment on the Palestinians was so accurate and such a teaching moment that you’ve now got every MSM out there talking about it. But guess what? People probably for the first time are realizing that these people have no right to that land and that they’re not attached as a people by DNA or culture or anything. THey’re Arabs, pure and simple.


32 posted on 12/12/2011 1:23:03 PM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ThomasMore

Look the Media HATED newt with a passion... Now they are planting good stories about him...???? Which means this.... He is a straw man candidate. They will build his support up and then BAM come out with a devastating story that will cause people to be demoralized and not vote. DONT BE SCHMUCKS. They did this with Mccain as well... anytime Politico is touting a republican candidate it is the wrong candidate. WAKE THE F . UP


33 posted on 12/12/2011 4:15:29 PM PST by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
Clearly if Newt was really the 'inside the beltway' guy; those 'inside the beltway' would be voting for him. No?

There is an irony here; with Mitt bragging that he is NOT the career politician; when all our Repub 'Establishment' is supporting him.

In which case; what does it matter 'who' is who'; rather than 'what constituency' a candidate is serving. And which power constituency is serving that candidate. . .

34 posted on 12/13/2011 9:42:06 PM PST by cricket (/get the 'Occupier' out of our White House!/ Newt can make it happen. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson