As a foreign popcorn-eating observer I finally got around to watching Mr. Cain’s speeches on youtube... I didn’t recognize any real Presidential material.
Interesting man, but no gravitas. Instead I am impressed by Newt, even though I disagree with him about certain issues of American exceptionalism. Plus I see his egg-headedness eventually turning against him (he’d better start turning more folksy ‘cause Americans don’t really go that big for intellectuals. (I wrote this book I scripted that movie).
Perry reminds me of Bush. But that’s just at a surperficial level. And I think he needs a second and third look. Ron Paul’s libertarianism is pied-piperish. So far I’d vote for Newt, though I’ll always have Sarah Palin in my heart.
For those complaining, just imagine that all your politicians were replaced by banking Czars. My Prime Minister (Goldman Sachs, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberger group and Moody’s) was appointed by a communist who just today reaped accolades from the NYTimes. Which leads me to think that Ron Paul isn’t so Pied Piperish after all, and maybe he too deserves another look. ‘Cause big government and crony Capitalism (that owns the newtorks, Academia and the money) is indeed extremely dangerous.
I’m confused, but so far Newt’s the one who gets my preference. He makes politics come alive. Forza America!
Screw principles, screw solutions, screw leadership, give us style and verbal gymnastics. The US political system has now descended into a sad childish Political Idol competition.
And the moron squad around here then wonder why they get no change out of DC EVER.
I’d be satisfied with Next, but if his campaign flames out, who is next?
Maybe Santorum? I think Sarah said something to the effect of we should all take a look at him.