When Iowa voters google Ginger White..they will see pro-Cain ads.
smart move esp since “Ginger White” is a homosexual
Good for him! He deserves to protect his name from that apparent lesbian:
Like! :)
IN YOUR FACE, MAINSTREAM HUSSEIN WORSHIPPING MEDIA!
Smart on Cain...thanks for posting :)
The blogger is lying. NO WHERE does ABC say this.
Sorry about that post. I meant it for MiddleEarth,
And you Perrybots never thought a black man could be so savvy...
Oh but wait, Google is run by the evil Democrats...so how could something like this show up? (I’m not taking a jab at you, Katie, just referring to some other conversations I’ve seen on FR).
I don’t want to let this one get by sickoflibs to ping others on his list. Herman may yet be fully vindicated of all these false charges. I continue to feel quite bad for not only Herman but his whole lovely family.
ROTFLMYBARACKOFF!
PURE GENIUS!
Cain’s next move should be to throw in a ‘wringer’. Get some woman to make another phony sexual harassment charge. If any reporters take the bait, catch ‘em on tape spewing their partisan Barbara Striesand. Then put the tape out on YouTube and watch it go viral.
"WHITE: The truth of the matter is, when I entered into this inappropriate relationship with Mr. Cain, I was single. I was not married. Mr. Cain has been married throughout the entire relationship. And, you know, it's unfortunate. As far as any proof, which has- you know, I was watching several media shows just last night. When you enter into a private relationship that you really do not care to share with the public, you really don't enter into something like that holding on to receipts. Holding on to gifts or if there were any notes or anything like that, to come out eventually and say, "Yeah, this is what happened and here is my proof." That's absolutely something that --STEPHANOPOULOS: What was the relationship, exactly? Was it an affair? Was it fun? Was it just sex? Tell us about it." -- ibid.
Yes, that's exactly what we'd expect, Ginger, 'here is my proof...(a) here are the gifts, (b) here are the deposits of the money' -- extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence!
And as usual, Stephie, you were two seconds too late cutting her off, you stuttering douchebag moron.
While I haven't let this affect my donating, it obviously will affect some thinking the day after they make a big donation he'll drop out. I think that's something that obviously comes to mind in some of his supporters who want to donate, if he's staying in it until the end with the goal of doing everything he can to win. As soon as he announces he's staying in, and taking his campaign to another level with a passionate, and motivating speech the donations will start pouring in almost instantly. I think he will stay in, and I hope that is what he decides because he's my last choice, and with Gingrich having enough baggage to fall at any time, Cain could easily rise again.
This is an outright fabrication.
1) You don’t “BUY” search terms. Anybody can use them. To suggest a person from the Cain campaign had to run to Google with a big fat check before someone else did is wrong. If you want a “keyword”, to trigger your ad, you bid a small amount you are willing to pay if the keyword triggers your ad to be shown and it is actually clicked by the user.
2) This is not proof that the Cain organization is, or ever has, used the keyword “Ginger White” in their advertising. Google servers track search habits to try to give results that are interesting to the user. Matches that are based on these results are called “session-based”. If you Google “Herman Cain” you will find articles with information on “Ginger White”. If she was a Google advertiser you would probably see her ads.
This is a prime example of the drivel that passes for reporting these days.