Herman Cain, if you are reading this, LISTEN to the heart of this matter. Your wife needs to tell us she knows about this relationship, and it was on the up and up, if there is MORE to come crawling out from under rocks you are hiding, PLEASE tell us now.
How much more “explaining” does Herman Cain need to do?
Ping. Add what you wish Herman could read. Ping the list.
Dear Mr. Cain;
Please ignore all of those who are willing to believe in unsubstantiated accusations.
Do not give up the fight! Our country desperately needs you.
Sincerely,
trisham
Mr. Cain, I support you.
Keep talking about the issues, and keep studying foreign policy. Yes, you will have advisers, but as president, the final decision will be yours, and you will have to rely on your gut. A deep, philosophical understanding geopolitics will be essential.
Ronald Reagan had one, and it served him (and us) well.
I wanted Cain to laugh it off, with no serious interviews or expensive lawyers perched over him. I wanted him to answer the MSMs stupid questions with replies like:
“You had to look back 15 years in my past to find someone to talk bad about me? Wow! That is great!”
or
“Good morning! Did anyone new accuse me of sexually harrasing them today?”
or
“I am sorry that this group of women are having financial difficulties and I sincerly hope that they are paid very well for their stories. I wish them well!”
or
“I have always deeply respected and admired the women I have been lucky enough to work with. I would never try to Clinton or Anthony Weiner anyone.”
Keep your stupid letter to yourself.
Have you considered the possibility that he is hesitant to defend himself because:
- it may be perceived as an attack on a poor unemployed single mother?
- and as such, is a set-up?
- or he is weighing the need to take this lying woman to court, and thus destroy the life of a (former) friend)?
- he is allowing other to find evidence against her ridiculous claims, thus keeping his hands clean?
“His response yesterday causes us to doubt that this accusation is 100% false.”
Speak for yourself. There is not a single doubt in my mind, even from the second I heard it, that it is 100% false. Why? Because I heard MRS. Cain speak about this woman on Greta and if SHE has no doubts, who am I to call her a liar?
The Cains, BOTH Cains, helped this woman. If YOU have doubts, that is on you.
I am proud of you posters on this thread. We must take our country back from professional politicians. They have been in charge since Eisenhower. The results are awful if you ask me. We need a Cain or Palin or even Trump type of person to drastically change the direction. Mitt or Newtor Perry ain’t going to change much, just tinker around the edges, and that will not save our younger generations. Although Perry is the better choice in those 3. Personally for me, it won’t matter who wins because I am happily retired. But I care more for the younger generations than myself.
I was prepared to flame you when I read the headline and the first sentence, but I will not.
Even if the allegations against him are 100% true, he’s still a better candidate for POTUS than either of the “front-runners”.
In fact, it’s not even close. Nobody else in the field has accomplished more in private life. Cain’s patriotism, at least, is not in question. Loyalty to the Republic should be the first requirement for the job.
That letter is a left handed slap.
I don’t care if he brings a bevy of beauties in bikinis to fawn over him at the next debate. I was on the Cain train from day one and see no reason to switch tracks now.
Dear Mr. Cain: I am so glad you haven’t permitted these Satanic attacks to bring you down.
It is so reassuring to see that you are obedient to God’s call for your life. May your supporters continue to stand firm with you in defiance of Satan and his disciples!
Any conservative president will require a much more conservative Congress. What do you think of term limits for Congress? Maybe three terms for the House and two for the Senate. And no pensions.! If they are paid well enough while in office, they should be able to save for retirement as the rest of us must do.
The Federal government was never meant to be a place for politicians to become wealthy! After a few years too many of seem to become so corrupted that they have brought us to where we find ourselves today!
Conserve, as you well know, means to preserve. To preserve our sacred documents which created the freedoms and opportunities we cherish so highly might be articulated in some of your speeches.
A fresh appraoach rather than repeating a speech, is always more exciting, don’t you think?
I wish you every success and I pray for your safety daily.
Paperdoll
Frankly, I don’t think Herman needs to explain anything more other than demand evidence from the press questioners to back up the accusations and demand an objective look at the women making the claims. Other than that, if he said he didn’t, the onus is on the presstitutes to show something. I believe his explanation that these allegations are nothing more than character assassination is right on; please note all these women have gaps a mile wide in their stories and financial and criminal/legal backgrounds that underscore the unreliability of their “claims.”
My response to the press would be: ‘Either show me the incriminating tapes, undies, photos or semen stained dresses or just shut-up and do your jobs as your ought.’