Posted on 11/26/2011 1:52:40 PM PST by Signalman
The IPCC is having a hard time disguising the fact that the planet is not in fact overheating
UN Trapped in Climate Turmoil – CHURCHVILLE, VA—The man-made warming activists at the UN are trapped in turmoil over how to deal with the earth’s lack of warming since 1998. A week or so ago, the UN climate panel circulated a draft statement that would have admitted we’re unlikely to have any further earth-warming for the next 30 years “because climate change signals are expected to be relatively small compared to natural climate variability.”
The BBC’s environmental reporter Richard Black reported that he’d received a copy of that draft. Black said he expected member governments to reject the statement, however, because it would embarrass the first-world governments’ green energy subsidies and taxes agenda. It would also have finally killed the world’s climate-terror campaign.
In fact, NASA and the U.S. Solar Observatory had already told us months ago to expect moderate global cooling for the next three decades due to a quiet period on the sun, and a consequent cooling of the Pacific Ocean’s huge heat mass.
Searching for a way out of the non-warming trap, one of the Intergovernmental Panel’s lead science authors announced that the climate computers had always correctly predicted non-warming lulls like ours. (We just missed that clause in the UN’s earlier press releases about the soon-to-be parboiled planet.) (Dennis Avery, CFP)
While the Earth and its climate have an age measured in Billions of years, these idiots get their panties in a twist about 100 year trends. Dangerous idiots.
If we had embarked on a carbon sequestration program in the late 90’s, just as was advocated as necessary, they’d now be telling us we dodge the bullet, as the stats now show, and are saved for having taken our medicine.
That’s OK. Now they just call it “Climate Change,” and the climate’s always changing. Warming, cooling, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, whatever — it’s all “human caused” and a win-win for junk “science.”
Your post is 100% insightful. That was the plan. They did not allow for the failure of Kyoto etc. - they underestimated the difficulty of establishing a trans-national programme incorporating so many different interests.
If such a programme had been put in place, it would be hailed now as a great success.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.