Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: conservaterian

So a FedEx warehouse worker makes enough money to live on their own?

This is part of the problem with many people here. You seem to think $10 an hour is enough to live on.
Maybe in 1980 it was. Not today...not without government assistance unless that’s what you are advocating. Would you rather these kids live on welfare?


52 posted on 11/20/2011 5:06:46 PM PST by floridarunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: floridarunner01

1981 my pay (and my future wife’s pay) was $3.35 an hour = 8.25 in 2011 dollars.

Take home pay for my wife and I was about $850.00 per month. We didn’t have internet, cell phones, car payments. Rent was $300 a month at the time. Long distance phone calls were a luxury, eating out was a luxury.

We didn’t mooch off of our parents. We didn’t have much spare money, but we weren’t dumpster diving either.

If one person can’t live on $10 an hour today, surely two people could. Find a room mate.


58 posted on 11/20/2011 5:37:09 PM PST by listenhillary (Look your representatives in the eye and ask if they intend to pay off the debt. They will look away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: floridarunner01
So a FedEx warehouse worker makes enough money to live on their own? This is part of the problem with many people here. You seem to think $10 an hour is enough to live on. Maybe in 1980 it was. Not today...not without government assistance unless that’s what you are advocating. Would you rather these kids live on welfare?
You sound like one of those "compassionate conservatives". I am far from advocatingfor welfare - advocating abolishing it, yes. $10/hour is PLENTY for someone just out of school to live on, unless they went to college to get one of those "liberal" arts degrees. 20k per year is plenty - maybe they will have to have roomates, not spend $200 month on a phone, don't need a big screen TV, HBO, etc. etc. Let them find out what it really means to earn a living, not get their automatic, government sponsored "living wage" that you seem to be advocating.
67 posted on 11/20/2011 6:34:11 PM PST by conservaterian (Sarah/DeMint '12-XXX= Now what? Cain?XX Guess not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: floridarunner01
You seem to think $10 an hour is enough to live on. Maybe in 1980 it was. Not today...not without government assistance--

It kind of depends. If one doesn't have a student loan and is in a medium-sized city where the standard of living is not astronomical... let's see. If it's 40 hours a week, that's about $1,600 before taxes. Maybe $1,300 after. A person alone could conceivably find a one-bedroom apartment for $600 (I just did a craigslist search for Milwaukee -- random choice -- and there are plenty.) Set aside $200 for utilities and phone and that leaves $500 to live on. Yeah, that's tight, but I've done it. It helps to be within walking distance of work. My definition of "walking distance" is 2 miles, but I'm pretty able-bodied. And before you say that's impossible, I lived in Michigan and had a night job two miles from my apartment, and I walked it even in the dead of winter. So... it can be done. It's just hard.

78 posted on 11/21/2011 5:02:42 AM PST by A_perfect_lady (Islam is as Islam does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson