You wrote:
“There are Protestant groups who actually claim they have Apostolic Succession from the very beginning.”
And taht has exactly what to do with Pizarro? Oh, yeah, NOTHING.
“Might be a difficult claim to substantiate, but aren’t they all.”
No, actually many aren’t.
“No time machines jack.”
No, just books you should ACTUALLY read, but probably won’t.
“Your understanding of Protestantism seems to go no further than Lutheranism. Sorry, that doesn’t cut it.”
In other words, you don’t have a single bit of evidence that Pizarro was a Protestant? That’s it, isn’t it? You have nothing, still, right?
“Many protestants consider Lutherans to simply be Catholics with a different name ~ ever see their services?”
None of that tells us a single thing about Pizarro - except that you aren’t posting any evidence for your claims.
“In Scandinavia they even call their ministers “priests” ~”
And again, that tells us nothing about Pizarro.
Time to put up or shut up. What’s it going to be?
You just want to argue. Bye Bye