Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce; SunkenCiv; E8crossE8

This is an example that we shall not believe everything we read. Their arguments are wrong as the state vectors are not orthogonal, hence their conclusions are not correct.

Read more here http://motls.blogspot.com/2011/11/nature-hypes-anti-qm-crackpot-paper-by.html


77 posted on 11/19/2011 12:49:59 AM PST by AdmSmith (GCTGATATGTCTATGATTACTCAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AdmSmith

Thanks AdmSmith.


83 posted on 11/19/2011 2:16:13 AM PST by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith

Awesome link, and I was mostly able to understand the rebuttal. It seems that it is rather obvious, and that the paper talked about in this post will (or should) be laughed off the stage.


84 posted on 11/19/2011 8:38:13 AM PST by Paradox (The rich SHOULD be paying more taxes, and they WOULD, if they could make more money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith
What's the point of constructing a basis out of non-orthogonal vectors anyway?

PS I like Motl's The Reference Frame, I should've thought to read what he had to say on it.

Cheers!

85 posted on 11/19/2011 10:13:44 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson