Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/12/2011 9:19:46 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Steelfish

When did the communist left decide to be concerned about revisionist history? They’ve been preaching it for 50 years. What little American history still being taught in “schools” is nothing but pure bovine scatology.


2 posted on 11/12/2011 9:25:15 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Stop Government Greed Now!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

How unprofessional. Wonder if BOR plays fast and loose with his ‘facts’ as he puts together his dog and pony show on FOX as well.


3 posted on 11/12/2011 9:29:59 PM PST by MichaelCorleone (Doesn't anyone love liberty anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

4 posted on 11/12/2011 9:45:44 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
I can't understand why O'Reilly felt the need to write another book about Lincoln in the first place. Interesting subject, to be sure, but misguided. The history is well-documented.

O'Reilly isn't someone I would turn to for original information. Everything he does is derivative even when he's quite correct about things he's willing to pontificate about.

I had hoped this WaPo piece would be more informative about the poor scholarship. The acreage of Dr. Mudd's farm? The number of times Our American Cousin had played at Fords before the fateful interrupted performance? I can dismiss those sorts of irrelevancies by concluding O'Reilly's book is like a lot of his work. An arrested adolescent's equivalent to children's literature, as O'Reilly would dismiss them, "for 'the Folks.'"

5 posted on 11/12/2011 9:51:53 PM PST by Prospero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
O’Reilly is a pompous blowhard mistake, period.
7 posted on 11/12/2011 9:57:19 PM PST by Sea Parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Only thing you got to know about Lincolns assasination was he was killed by a famous actor who go his career from his daddy, who hated Republicans, and wanted the Government to keep blacks enslaved. In essence Sean Penn.


9 posted on 11/12/2011 10:16:44 PM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (Nancy Pelosi - The #1 reason we need a Constitutional amendment for Congressional drug testing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

I also noticed there was a book about Lincoln the Vampire Slayer.


10 posted on 11/12/2011 10:28:05 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Ted Baxter strikes again!


11 posted on 11/12/2011 10:39:02 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Well, the Washington Post gets facts wrong and misspells words every freaking day. I guess that means we should ignore everything you print because of it.


14 posted on 11/12/2011 10:44:45 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
I would never read O'Reilly's book.

But, the WaPo's writer can't write, himself.

"According to Steers, the authors misidentified theater owner John Ford’s chief carpenter as James J. Clifford when his name actually was James J. Gifford."

15 posted on 11/12/2011 10:46:44 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife ("Real solidarity means coming together for the common good."-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Levingston didn’t have a problem with the liar who wrote a book about Sarah Palin...

http://inthearena.blogs.cnn.com/2011/05/23/steven-levingston-new-tell-all-book-on-sarah-palin-by-former-confidant-frank-bailey-expresses-an-insiders-loss-of-faith/


17 posted on 11/12/2011 10:50:01 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

What a scam! According to the article, Bill O’Reilly “researched” his book by reading all of the other books written about Lincoln and then wrote his book. Seriously, what new information could O’Reilly possibly reveal? All of the players have been dead for 100 years or more!

I feel sorry for all of the genuine historians without famous names that did all of the hard work and actually researched their books just to see O’Reilly take their work and re-word it into a best-seller and make millions while doing it. Plus, he’s going to “write” two more books!

Another thing, his TV show seems like a commercial for his books. I can’t turn the channel quick enough when he’s plugging his books. He no sooner finishes plugging the last book and he’s then plugging the next one.


20 posted on 11/13/2011 12:16:59 AM PST by dupree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

My wife bought me one of his books several years ago. It was terrible. Many of the “points” were infantile.


23 posted on 11/13/2011 2:56:05 AM PST by youngidiot (Hear Hear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

His name is mudd now...


26 posted on 11/13/2011 3:52:18 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
I have heard that Michael Kauffman's American Brutus is extremely well researched. Random House published it, as opposed to the equally estimable Holt, which did O'Reilly's book. Sometimes the schedule does not permit the checking that needs to be done.
29 posted on 11/13/2011 4:08:39 AM PST by firebrand (It's almost too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

I didn’t realize the editors of the magazine “North and South...” are communists.


30 posted on 11/13/2011 4:23:17 AM PST by cydcharisse (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish; All

Off topic

Putting together some books for a 14 year old boy for Christmas. Bishop’s “The Day Lincoln Was Shot” is on that list. I read it at about that age (more than 50 years ago) and am wondering if it is still considered “non-fiction” today, or should I drop it from my list?

Thanks in advance


31 posted on 11/13/2011 5:15:59 AM PST by Roccus (Obama & Holder LLP, Procurers of fine arms to the most discerning drug lords (202) 456-1414)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
Off-topic question: Has anyone read or started reading Seal Target Geronimo? I am about halfway through. His war writing is wonderful, but I am in the historical part now and am wondering how accurate and/or objective it is.
35 posted on 11/13/2011 10:02:05 AM PST by firebrand (It's almost too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Ford’s Theater IS selling the book.’

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-oreilly-fords-theater-is-selling-his-lincoln-book-despite-minor-misstatements/


42 posted on 11/15/2011 1:28:44 PM PST by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson