Posted on 11/11/2011 6:56:17 AM PST by Liberty1970
And yet you obsessively follow it too. ;-)
What are they going to be running these on? LabView?
Why even waste time on a topic if you are so convinced that each and every piece of data on the subject is indicative of a lie, pre-emptively so that you don't even try to verify it? I see the close-minded folks whine about Kevmo and myself wasting others time, but nothing forces you to read a post. Instead you waste the time of those of us who are looking for data, as we try to read each post of a thread trying to gain actual knowledge.
I’m simply not letting people associate FReepers with thsi scam by not responding to it.
Why not contact them yourself if you doubt it?It wouldn't be efficient (or polite) for everyone to launch their own investigation of the source of this.
It's not at all uncommon for scammers to make up announcements about major companies being involved in their "business opportunity". HERE is coverage of Carl Tilly's scam, which included, among other things, a press release that General Electric was prepared to "buy them out, sight unseen, for $2 billion".
Interestingly enough, this links to the same web site that published the notice of Rossi's deal with National Instruments. It appears that they were giving Tilley uncritical coverage and support until it became obvious that it was a fraud.
He also is a true believer in some "magnetic motor" that runs without any source of energy (i.e. a perpetual motion machine).
He is, at best, gullible. He certainly is not a credible source of information.
So no prophy bus or ethernet controls?
Still, it is somewhat apples and oranges to dismiss the NI report because of the author's gullibility regarding other energy production claims. Either Rossi has a business relationship with NI or he does not. And either the author received information on that relationship or not. It's not a matter if him blindly trusting in someone's claims. He said he was on a conference call with Rossi himself when he got the information, and then other confirmatory emails are cited at the end of the article.
So either a skeptic needs to widen their circle of skepticism from Rossi to this fellow (who is not merely gullible but dishonest as well if the confirmatory email is an invention of his), or the author has simply reported something accurately. What to make of that report, assuming it's true, is food for thought and why I posted this article.
He said he was on a conference call with Rossi himself when he got the information, and then other confirmatory emails are cited at the end of the article.Given his obvious gullibility, I wouldn't trust him to verify any aspect of this.
Did he contact National Instruments? Or did he accept Rossi's word that the person on the other end of the phone was, in fact, a representative? Did he get emails directly from NI? Or did Rossi forward him something that looked like an email from NI?
Maybe this business relationship is real. When (if) we see NI make a public statement (i.e. a press release actually released to the press, or a notice on their web site) then it will be clear that this is true.
But just because Stirling Alan says that Rossi says that it's real doesn't make it real.
An automated control system requires a complete and thorough understanding in theory and in application of what you are needing to control.Embedded Monitoring & Control Systems - http://www.ni.com/embedded/Good luck with that.
Control System Design and Deployment for Wind Applications - http://www.ni.com/wind/controlsystems.htm
Industrial Measurement and Control - http://www.ni.com/industrial/
Industrial Control Systems - http://www.processanddata.com/industrial-control-systems/
Building a Nuclear Reactor Control System Upgrade with NI LabVIEW and FieldPoint - http://sine.ni.com/cs/app/doc/p/id/cs-362
Awww, come on guys, it's so simple maybe you need a refresher course. [leans arm on hot engine part, then jumps away] Heyya! It's all ball bearings nowadays. Now you prepare that Fetzer valve with some 3-in-1 oil and some gauze pads, and I'm gonna need 'bout ten quarts of anti-freeze, preferably Prestone. No, no make that Quaker State.
Im simply not letting people associate FReepers with thsi scam by not responding to it.Do you want to place any wagers on the line?
Or are you proffering lip service only?
Your conspiracy theories are hilarious. It took Edison a long time to get the light bulb working, and I don’t remember the whale oil industry sending teams of assassins to his workshop.
It is weird. This wouldn't be news for anyone but Rossi, who even Kevmo says sucks at giving crappy demos.
You don't think Rossi is trying to use NI's good name to lend credibility to his scam do you? Rossi's finally doing something that any competent and legitimate engineer would have done months or years ago without fanfare, but when Rossi does it, it's big news. I think Rossi is now in the phase where he'll be taking money from suckers.
I hope they get their money up front.
Why should oil kill Edison. His invention has no impact on them. Coal barons will love it because it means every city will need power plants, not just individual factories. Read how ruthless the oil barons were to achieve monopoly. A lot of good small operators paid the price in fortune and sometimes with their lives.
You don't think Rossi is trying to use NI's good name to lend credibility to his scam do you?As I mentioned above, Tilley claimed to his stockholders that G.E. was ready to buy the company for $2 billion (which was a lie). The only reason I think it might be real is that Rossi is now so high-profile that N.I. would hear about it. Rossi isn't stupid enough to risk having N.I. publicly contradict him.
We'll see. There is always the chance that Rossi is legit, although I have trouble believing that anyone could make a legitimate "breakthrough" look so much like a con job.
Even if this is true, it may only mean that Rossi has placed an order for controllers. I'm sure N.I. will happily sell controllers to anyone, even Rossi. Whether he actually pays for them, and whether he actually has fusion reactors to hook them up to remains to be seen.
“Why should oil kill Edison. His invention has no impact on them.”
I said whale oil. Prior to the lightbulb, the whaling industry was one of the most profitable industries, akin to petroleum nowadays, because whale oil was a prime source of clean lamp oil. Edison put them out of business.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.