Posted on 11/09/2011 9:47:15 AM PST by MBT ARJUN
ISLAMABAD: Text books in Pakistani schools foster prejudice and intolerance of Hindus and other religious minorities, while most teachers view non-Muslims as ”enemies of Islam,” according to a study by a US government commission released on Wednesday.
The findings indicate how deeply ingrained hard-line Islam is in Pakistan and help explain why militancy is often supported, tolerated or excused in the country.
”Teaching discrimination increases the likelihood that violent religious extremism in Pakistan will continue to grow, weakening religious freedom, national and regional stability, and global security,” said Leonard Leo, the chairman of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom.
Pakistan was created in 1947 as a homeland for the Muslims of South Asia and was initially envisaged as a moderate state where minorities would have full rights.
But three wars with mostly Hindu India; support for militants fighting Soviet-rule in Afghanistan in the 1980s; and the appeasement of hard-line clerics by weak governments seeking legitimacy have led to a steady radicalisation of society.
Religious minorities and those brave enough to speak out against intolerance have often been killed, seemingly with impunity, by militant sympathizers.
The commission warned that any significant efforts to combat religious discrimination, especially in education, would ”likely face strong opposition” from hardliners.
The study reviewed more than 100 textbooks from grades 1-10 from Pakistan’s four provinces.
Researchers in February this year visited 37 public schools, interviewing 277 students and teachers, and 19 madrases, where they interviewed 226 students and teachers.
The Islamisation of textbooks began under the US-backed rule of army dictator Gen. Zia-ul-Haq, who courted Islamists to support his rule.
In 2006, the government announced plans to reform the curriculum to address the problematic content, but that has not been done, the study said.
Pakistan’s Islamist and right-wing polity would likely oppose any efforts to change the curriculum, and the government has shown no desire to challenge them on the issue.
The report found systematic negative portrayals of minorities, especially Hindus and to a lesser extent to Christians.
Hindus make up more than one per cent of Pakistan’s 180 million people, while Christians represent around two per cent. Some estimates put the numbers higher.
There are also even smaller populations of Sikhs and Buddhists.
”Religious minorities are often portrayed as inferior or second-class citizens who have been granted limited rights and privileges by generous Pakistani Muslims, for which they should be grateful,” the report said.
”Hindus are repeatedly described as extremists and eternal enemies of Islam whose culture and society is based on injustice and cruelty, while Islam delivers a message of peace and brotherhood, concepts portrayed as alien to the Hindu.”
The books don’t contain many specific references to Christians, but those that ”that do exist seem generally negative, painting an incomplete picture of the largest religious minority in Pakistan,” the report said.
Attempts to reach Pakistan’s education minister were not successful.
The textbooks make very little reference to the role played by Hindus, Sikhs and Christians in the cultural, military and civic life of Pakistan, meaning ”a young minority student will thus not find many examples of educated religious minorities in their own textbooks,” the report said.
”In most cases historic revisionism seems designed to exonerate or glorify Islamic civilisation, or to denigrate the civilisations of religious minorities,” the report said.
”Basic changes to the texts would be needed to present a history free of false or unsubstantiated claims which convey religious bias.”
The researchers also found that the books foster a sense that Pakistan’s Islamic identity is under constant threat.
”The anti-Islamic forces are always trying to finish the Islamic domination of the world,” read one passage from social studies text being taught to Grade 4 students in Punjab province, the country’s most populated.
”This can cause danger for the very existence of Islam. Today, the defense of Pakistan and Islam is very much in need.”
The report states that Islamic teachings and references were commonplace in compulsory text books, not just religious ones, meaning Pakistan’s Christians, Hindus and other minorities were being taught Islamic content.
It said this appeared to violate Pakistan’s constitution, which states that students should not have to receive instruction in a religion other than their own.
The attitudes of the teachers no doubt reflect the general intolerance in Pakistan.
The 2011 Pew Research Center study found the country is the third most intolerant in the world, but because of the influence they have, they are especially worrisome.
Their views were frequently nuanced and sometimes contradictory.
If you follow the money, I think you will find that the textbooks were funded by our friends, the Saudis.
They’re just “doin’ what comes naturally” to muslims.
Hindu? or Christian, Jew, Infidel, etc.. etc.. etc...
And the Hindus in India teach hatred of all other religions: Christians, Sikhs, others. And they carry out violence against religious minorities that has resulted in hundreds of thousands of people being killed. They do this with impunity.
We are hearing from minorities. There are plenty of organizations over there, ranging from the Movement Against State Repression to the International Human Rights Organization to Persecuted Church of India to so many others.
Most likely.
The organizations are representing the people. The mass murders of minorities are fact, but they’ve been covered up by the Indian media and the political system. The international media only reports what the authorities over there tell them.
That's pretty much whatever organization claims. Same with CAIR and ACLU. Nope organization are organization (they have their own agendas and vested interests) and people are people.
Your nonsense is quite unbelievable. Why would Indian media cover up mass murder? Indian media is independent, they are not run any government? And international only reports what the authorities tell them, why would they not do their own investigation like they do everywhere else?
Have you ever been to India and talked to minorities? I am guessing you haven't. So what you think you know is really all just garbage.
Correction: That’s pretty much WHAT EVERY organization claims.
How do the people make their voice heard? Many individuals (such as John Dayal) have done terrific work in exposing the violence, repression, and abuse, but the organizations also do a lot of good in reporting on it. That you choose not to believe them is too bad for you.
Nominally.
“That you choose not to believe them is too bad for you.”
You are saying I choose not to believe them? So I should disregard my years of first hand experience living in India and believe someone who is on payroll of Christian Evangelical organization and is discredited by Indian media as “biased” “spews venom on Hindu community” and “misrepresenting Catholic Church”. No thank you.
And since you have never been to India, I say this again. You have no idea about India and your Internet sources are obscure garbage.
“Nominally.”
Nominally? Can you please explain that?
You know wwhat mate,you like a frog in well who thinks world is well and am the king of this world.you don’t even know what you talking here mate..
ya ya...Just like Fox news???
This is what happen when your typing speed is more than you brain transmission speed ..
Hate to tell you this, Arjun, you Hindustani stooge, but I have followed, studied, and written about South Asian issues for close to 20 years. I know more about what’s going on than toadies like you think I’m supposed to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.