Again. That is SCIENTIFIC proof. There are other kinds of proof.Sorry, I don't accept the "ex-con claims" type of "proof".
And, in point of fact, several scientists, using different test equipment, at different labs, HAVE reproduced the overall phenomenon. So that meaning is OUT.Most of them are working with completely different reactions, and none of them have Rossi's "secret" catalyst to test, so your statement is false.
To the best of my knowledge, no one doing legitimate LENR research is rushing their gadgets to market. Rossi is the only one acting like a late-night infomercial.
You and those like you always discount that there are other people making observations during the tests. People with very relevant expertise and background. So it's not a question of "implicit trust" in Rossi.Using Rossi's test equipment, installed by Rossi, and allegedly calibrated by Rossi. Even then, Rossi has limited what they were allowed to witness. Any half-compentent magician could do better than Rossi has done.
Blah, blah, blah. Stop wasting my time with this crap.Wow! You really got me there. I am shattered by the power of your argument.
OK, I won't bother you any more. It's clear that you are unable to argue your position effectively.
Your problem, not mine. Rossi has spent his whole life doing technology. The transgressions he is/was guilty of were technical violations of environmental laws (outside of the gold thing, which I can't find enough info on)".
I can find NO instance where he has faked technology.
"Most of them are working with completely different reactions, and none of them have Rossi's "secret" catalyst to test, so your statement is false."
They're all using the Ni-H system, and various different conditions. They're all getting excess power. My statement is TRUE.
"To the best of my knowledge, no one doing legitimate LENR research is rushing their gadgets to market. Rossi is the only one acting like a late-night infomercial.
Rossi's actions are not much different from Patterson, who "was" trying to get his gadget to market. Unfortunately, he died....but his approach is on that has been replicated, though on his substrate.
"Using Rossi's test equipment, installed by Rossi, and allegedly calibrated by Rossi. Even then, Rossi has limited what they were allowed to witness.
Sorry, not true. At least for the first few demos, some of the investigators brought their own. And in those runs, the only limitation was on the measurement of the gamma ray energy spectrum.
"OK, I won't bother you any more. It's clear that you are unable to argue your position effectively."
Promise??? It's hard to pursue logic with one who is completely illogical and refuses to examine any primary evidence. Have you STILL not read the reports???