[EBH]

To number #1: The glitch to all of your questions is the non-disclosure agreement. He was not at liberty to out himself. Non-disclosures often cover both parties in cases of sexual harassment. Not remembering, actually yes I can see that given the time frame. Not remembering all the minutia. I've dealt with more than a few discrimination cases and no I don't recall every detail years later. Pay-out packages etc. They are dealt with and you move on. HR handles the matter and if it comes up years later you refer to the company as the case is with the company. It is the company that settled, not the accused. It is litigation between lawyers other than maybe giving a statement...it was out of his hands.

#2 Again, there is no cover-up. It is a non-disclosure agreement. He would need agreement with the women to come out as you desire.

[samtheman]

Non-disclosure does NOT prevent you from saying “I have two settlements in my past regarding allegations of sexual harrassment”.

Does it?

Please just answer that question.

Cain himself briefed his then-campaign manager on the issue back in his Senate campaign. Was that a violation of non-disclosure?

Again, I’m going to repeat the question in the clearest language I can muster:

Does non-disclosure mean that you cannot mention that a case existed and a settlement was reached?

Please answer that question.

And you glossed over #2. WTF exactly WAS the Perry campaign accused of doing and why walk that accusation back exactly one day later?

That is the single most amateurish act of ANY presidential campaign I have EVER witnessed in my life and ever read about in US history.

If you can defend that, then you have stars in your eyes.

(And I am NOT a Perry supporter. I KNOW the Perry campaign is over and I will not vote for him in the primary, no matter what else is going on.)