Posted on 11/03/2011 12:19:06 PM PDT by Liberty1970
*Ping* for your list.
I just heard about a device called a ‘podunk carbuerator’ and if you send in $10 they will send you the plans- the oil companies don’t want you to buy it because it gets 100 miles to the gallon
As with so much of Rossi’s so called data and demonstrated proof, this is gobbledy gook of the worst sort. He has accomplished nothing until it is repeatable by independent scientists. Good luck with that
Thank you for pointless, irrelevant posts. Guess I’ll bold-face my request for relevance next time.
“E-cat as a water or building heating system”
Think of the leading suppliers of building automation who are now very heavily involved in energy efficiency improvements:
Honeywell
Schneider Electric
Emerson
Siemens
Johnson Controls
All could be good partners for ECAT merely as a heat source if it were more efficient than other fuels, aside from any power generating capacity. Half of all energy is consumed for commercial and industrial purposes, and a good chunk of that is for heating.
If the DoD were a buyer, it would be under a non-disclosure agreement.
Saying that the customer needed the device for "remote camps" would be a violation of any NDA and an automatic deal-breaker.
Rossi is a lying jailbird running a scam.
That is blisteringly obvious to anyone who has avoided the Kool-Aid.
That’s a good list of parties that would be interested earlier than most. Unfortunately I am not aware of any bits of data linking any of them to Rossi or the ECAT. I wouldn’t be surprised if they are paying close attention though.
The only part of the article worth reading.
You are jumping to conclusions since you don’t know the details of the NDA or if there even is one, nor the context of this commment. Indeed, I’m trying now to nail down the origin of that very comment. It appears at the PESN website (http://pesn.com/2011/11/02/9501943_Rossis_E-Cat_Victory_on_Cold_Fusion_Emergence_Day—E-Day/), where Hank Mills, in a very triumphalistic write-up, writes that Rossi wrote this in an email. But there is no further detail as to when the email was written or to whom, etc. Obviously that is a critical detail, and needs to be taken with a grain of salt regardless of ones’ position on the ECAT.
The only flaw in your logic is this:
“The basic point of the military is to protect American citizens and their interests.”
The US military is under the command of a marxist moslem, who has no business ordering troops to be in Libya or Uganda.
But the other point is that those who are convinced that this whole thing is a fraud, will never give it a rest. Small minds have nothing better to do.
As expected, the whole thing is dissolving into a farce.
Doesn't matter if it's more efficient ~ it should be possible to keep 100 years worth of nickel filings on hand.
Why?
If (Big IF) the ECAT turns out to be real, they ought to be bumped to the very back of the line when it comes to purchasing one. ;-)
If it had been bought by a military or government concern, it would not have been an open test. The device would be on its way to a test lab right now, not deployment somewhere.
The whole “customer” thing looks like a scam that they’re trying to hint is some big deal in order to gain legitimacy. That coupled with the fact that paying customers will be the future functional proof.
Time will tell.
I really can’t see this thing as being operational without having been regulated out of existence by various government entities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.