Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Immerito

Yes, even with all of that, I thought the films were very entertaining.

As Jackson himself said, they had to condense characters, switch certain roles, in order to get the movies to work with an acceptable time limit.

And I think you’re wrong about Tolkien not allowing the films to be made: he sold the rights for a film version in 1968 or 1969 depending on what source you read and would have had little or no ability to stop a film treatment - especially since he died 5 years later.

http://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/United_Artists


8 posted on 10/29/2011 7:14:13 PM PDT by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998

Did you ever read Letter 210?

http://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/Letter_210

Yes, Tolkien did sell filming rights-—but that does not imply that he would have approved of the final result, as evidenced in letter 210.


11 posted on 10/29/2011 7:19:26 PM PDT by Immerito (Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: vladimir998

“As Jackson himself said:”

“Sure, it’s not really THE LORD OF THE RINGS ... but it could still be a pretty damn cool movie.” —Peter Jackson

Taken from:

http://tolkien.slimy.com/faq/Resources.html

and

http://www.theonering.com/page3-25/TheMoviesTheCompleteListofFilmChanges


17 posted on 10/29/2011 7:42:52 PM PDT by Immerito (Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson