Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Of course, the professional whiners at CAIR are whining on her behalf.

The most disturbing thing about this story is that the school district and the Army are taking this seriously at all.

1 posted on 10/20/2011 4:48:58 PM PDT by Hunton Peck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Hunton Peck

Not happening unless they perceive themselves as being Sikhs.... =.=


2 posted on 10/20/2011 4:52:51 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hunton Peck

... always pushing the envelope, always ...


3 posted on 10/20/2011 4:53:30 PM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hunton Peck

The problem is that the Army has made exceptions for Sikhs without changing the AR 670-1.

The OIC made the right call in asking higher and higher made the right call in saying it’s outside the regs.

My main beef with sikhs and anyone else wanting to buck the regs is that serving in the military is *not* a right. Plenty of Americans willing to put on the proper uniform are denied entry because of previous crimes, minor physical issues, etc.

Warrior Ethos states, “I will always place the mission first.” It doesn’t say, “I will always place the mission first, unless my religion says I can’t.”


4 posted on 10/20/2011 4:54:31 PM PDT by cizinec ("Brother, your best friend ain't your Momma, it's the Field Artillery.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hunton Peck

We have female soldiers in Afghanistan wearing them to appease the Muzzies (instead of Kevlar helmets!!), so I guess why not?


5 posted on 10/20/2011 4:55:02 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hunton Peck

A resounding...HELL NO!!


7 posted on 10/20/2011 5:01:50 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hunton Peck

And I wanted to wear my Bud Lite ballcap during my basic training in ‘87. I just wasn’t stupid or conceited enough to think the Army would change their rules for me.


10 posted on 10/20/2011 5:25:07 PM PDT by DesertSapper (CAIN 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hunton Peck
The wearing of a Mohammedan head covering is the wearing of an enemy symbol in no way different from a WWII American soldier wearing a swastika. Besides, what is a good little Mohammedan slave doing associating with free men?
12 posted on 10/20/2011 5:40:24 PM PDT by magslinger (To properly protect your family you need a Bible, a twelve gauge and a pig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hunton Peck

The story doesn’t say what her family background is, but if she wants to wear that thing on her head, I suggest she return to her ancestral lands and try pushing the envelope there. When in Rome...


13 posted on 10/20/2011 5:53:52 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hunton Peck

Clearly someone doesn’t understand the definition of “uniform”.


15 posted on 10/20/2011 5:59:22 PM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ./base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hunton Peck

Poor widdle Muslim wanted to cry.....boo-hoo. Accept our ways of life and our rules or pack up and leave.

Does she cry when innocent people are slaughtered in the name of her “religion”? My guess is no.


17 posted on 10/20/2011 6:37:49 PM PDT by POWERSBOOTHEFAN (Straight and proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hunton Peck

Not only no, but f_ck no!


23 posted on 10/21/2011 5:36:41 AM PDT by j_tull (I may make you feel, but I can't make you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson