To: Hunton Peck
The wearing of a Mohammedan head covering is the wearing of an enemy symbol in no way different from a
WWII American soldier wearing a swastika. Besides, what is a good little Mohammedan slave doing associating with free men?
12 posted on
10/20/2011 5:40:24 PM PDT by
magslinger
(To properly protect your family you need a Bible, a twelve gauge and a pig.)
To: magslinger
"what is a good little Mohammedan slave doing associating with free men?"
My guess is, it's for the specific purpose of pulling a stunt like this.
14 posted on
10/20/2011 5:56:28 PM PDT by
Hunton Peck
(See my FR homepage for a list of businesses that support WI Gov. Scott Walker)
To: magslinger
Oh, and that’s an interesting link. I had no idea that symbol had become anathema as early as 1933.
16 posted on
10/20/2011 6:01:46 PM PDT by
Hunton Peck
(See my FR homepage for a list of businesses that support WI Gov. Scott Walker)
To: magslinger
According to the article you posted they didn’t use the swastica when Germany also adopted it and changed to the Thunderbird in the 30’s. So, according to your article, American soldiers did not wear the swastika on their uniforms during WWII.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson