Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: csense

“Yes, but how does “excitement” change the quality or quantity of the pool of candidates.”

Because the voters were more familiar with Palin than Bachmann, Cain, or Perry. They may not have bothered to listen to them much, hoping that Palin was going to be running. Her daughter said last summer, that her mother definitely knew whether or not she was running. No one would have cared about “Undefeated” or some of her speeches if she wasn’t going to be running.


153 posted on 10/10/2011 12:51:02 AM PDT by Politics4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: Politics4US
Because the voters were more familiar with Palin than Bachmann, Cain, or Perry. They may not have bothered to listen to them much, hoping that Palin was going to be running. Her daughter said last summer, that her mother definitely knew whether or not she was running. No one would have cared about “Undefeated” or some of her speeches if she wasn’t going to be running.

Again, how does this change the pool of candidates. If your definition for harm is minor changes in the dynamics of the race, which is obvious, then you're not really saying much.

154 posted on 10/10/2011 12:58:05 AM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson